Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

SECTION C: ENGINEERING

Vol. 15 No. 2 (2023)

Assessment of WASH barriers in semi-rural Andean communities - Pilot study

DOI
https://doi.org/10.18272/aci.v15i2.2986
Submitted
May 17, 2023
Published
2023-12-07

Abstract

Water service in rural areas is a problem as they constantly fail to deliver a complete and efficient service to all users dependent on it or the systems implemented fail to be sustainable with the service and impact desired. Ecuador is no exception to this problem and like many other countries in the world it has failures in the quality of its rural water distribution systems. Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) sector approaches have been aimed at understanding the problems related to water, sanitation, and hygiene, as well as improving systems to achieve high impact public health and sustainable solutions. In Ecuador, WASH has attempted to develop an evidence-based database focused on the status of WASH targets and their relationship to poverty. The objective of this study is to raise barriers found in semi-rural Andean communities based on indicators raised around three approaches: cultural, third-party intervention and physical. For this purpose, interviews were elaborated based on compiled information provided by United Nations Children´s Fund (UNICEF) relevant to the evaluation of aspects related to water, sanitation, and hygiene in households. The information obtained from the respondents' answers was transcribed in order to elaborate a database, then the answers that had the same theme encompassing the key idea were grouped and coded. The results were then filtered based on the indicators of the 3 dimensions proposed in this pilot study, from which a table was created with the barriers found. As results we found barriers related to each of the indicators, highlighting the cultural aspect of water consumption and the role of women within the family, physical limitations, and the lack of technology to solve them and the lack of support or incomplete support from third parties. It is important to understand that communities act as complex systems where the same barriers cannot be extended to all the contexts of semi-rural Andean areas, much less Ecuador, each community must be studied individually to find their respective limitations and provide the most appropriate solution to have a high impact and be sustainable.

viewed = 240 times

References

  1. Edeso, M. (2021). WASH: Estrategia de agua, saneamiento e higiene. ¿Qué es? Fundación Anesvad. https://www.anesvad.org/estapasando/definicion-estrategia-wash-anesvad/
  2. Davis, A., Javernick-Will, A. y Cook, S. (2017). Multi-method approach to identify community practices for sanitation systems. Engineering Project Organization Conference. Stanford, EE. UU. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326379121_Multi-Method_Approach_to_Identify_Community_Priorities_for_Sanitation_Systems
  3. Rahman, Mst. F., Hossen, Md. A., Pal, S. K., Mazumder, M. H., Hasan, S. M. F. y Hoque, Md. M. (2022). Evaluating knowledge, awareness and associated water usage towards hand hygiene practices influenced by the current COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 19, 100848. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2022.100848
  4. Lise Kingo, Durán, P., Cortés, J., & Chávez, D. (2015). Los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) o cómo aterrizar la utopía de un mundo mejor. UNESDOC. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000252423
  5. Faure, J., Faust, K. y Kaminsky, J. (2019). Legitimization of the inclusion of cultural practices in the planning of water and sanitation services for displaced persons. Water, 11(2), 359. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020359
  6. Workman, C. L., Cairns, M. R., de los Reyes, F. L. y Verbyla, M. E. (2021). Global water, sanitation, and hygiene approaches: Anthropological contributions and future directions for engineering. Environmental Engineering Science, 38(5), 402–417. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2020.0321
  7. Avila Ruiz, F. (2021). Algunos conceptos y consejos para llegar al desarrollo sostenible. Zenodo. doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.5171407
  8. Zarza, L. (2021). ¿Qué significa WASH? Iagua. https://www.iagua.es/respuestas/que-significa-wash
  9. Romero, C. (2015, junio 30). Logros y desafíos del agua y saneamiento en la región. Naciones Unidas. https://news.un.org/es/audio/2015/06/1409621
  10. Gutiérrez, A. Q. y Salto, A. (2022). ¿Qué es una comunidad semirural y cuál es la labor de PRAE? Proyecto Roberto. https://www.proyectoroberto.org.mx/la-gaceta/que-es-una-comunidad-semirural-y-cual-es-la-labor-de-prae/
  11. Martínez, L. (2002). Economía política de las comunidades indígenas. Abya-Yala. https://ocaru.org.ec/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Economi-a-poli-ltica-de-las-comunidades-indi-genas-Luciano-Marti-nez-Valle.pdf
  12. Godoy, I., Marx, J., Freire, M. J. y Campillo, R. (2018, agosto 16). Territorios rurales Zuleta. OPTE. https://opteuce.com/portfolio/territorios-rurales-zuleta/
  13. Korovkin, T. (2001 Reinventing the Communal Tradition: Indigenous Peoples, Civil Society, and Democratization in Andean Ecuador. Latin American Research Review, 36(3), 37–67. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2692120
  14. North, L. L. (2008). El desarrollo rural: Sine qua non del desarrollo nacional. Revista del Centro Andino de Estudios Internacionales, 8(2), 1–19. https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/comentario/article/download/123/131
  15. Prüss-Üstün, A., Kay, D., Fewtrell, L. y Bartram, J. (2004). Unsafe Water, Sanitation and Hygiene. In M. Ezzati, A. López, A. Rodgers y C. Murray (Eds.), Comparative Quantification of Health Risks: Global and Regional Burden of Disease Attributable to Selected Major Risk Factors (pp. 1321-1352). World Health Organization Geneva. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/253651949_Unsafe_Water_Sanitation_and_Hygiene
  16. World Health Organization. (2022). Water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH). World Health Organization Health Topics. https://www.who.int/health-topics/water-sanitation-and-hygiene-wash#tab=tab_1
  17. UNICEF. (2021b). Sanitation. UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/wash/sanitation
  18. UNICEF. (2021a). Hygiene. UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/wash/hygiene
  19. UNICEF Ecuador. (2019, diciembre 02). Respuesta de UNICEF Ecuador en WASH: Planta de Tratamiento de Agua en Rumichaca [video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhNJ9NcCr68&ab_channel=UNICEFEcuador
  20. Azoulay, A. (2019). Informe Mundial de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Desarrollo de los Recursos Hídricos 2019: No dejar a nadie atrás. UNESCO. https://www.fuhem.es/media/cdv/file/biblioteca/LecturasRecomendadas/2019/No-dejar-anadie-atrasC.pdf
  21. UNICEF. (2017). Estrategia de agua, saneamiento e higiene 2016–2030. UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/ecuador/media/3701/file
  22. Davis, A., Javernick-Will, A. y Cook, S. (2018). The use of qualitative comparative analysis to identify pathways to successful and failed sanitation systems. Science of The Total Environment, 663, 1–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.291
  23. Valcourt, N., Walters, J., Javernick-Will, A., Linden, K. y Hailegiorgis, B. (2020). Understanding rural water services as a complex system: An assessment of key factors as potential leverage points for improved service sustainability. Sustainability, 12(3), 1243. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031243
  24. Ecuadorian Water Regulation and Control Agency. (2018, marzo 22). ARCA celebra, con trabajo y resultados, el Día Mundial del Agua. ARCA. http://www.regulacionagua.gob.ec/arca-celebra-con-trabajo-y-resultados-el-diamundial-del-agua/
  25. Harvey, A. (2021, julio). Ten factors for viable rural water services. Global Waters. https://www.globalwaters.org/resources/assets/ten-factors-viable-rural-water-services
  26. World Bank Group. (2017). Pipe(d) dreams: Water supply, sanitation, and hygiene progress and remaining challenges in Ecuador. Wash Poverty Diagnostic Series, 1, 1–55. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/28223
  27. Ramesh, A., Blanchet, K., Ensink, J. H. J. y Roberts, B. (2015). Evidence on the effectiveness of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions on health outcomes in humanitarian crises: A systematic review. PLOS ONE, 10(9), e0124688. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124688
  28. Walters, J. P. (2016). Exploring the use of social network analysis to inform exit strategies for rural water and sanitation NGOs. Engineering Project Organization Journal, 6(2–4), 92–103. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/21573727.2016.1241243
  29. Pugel, K., Peabody, S. y Javernick-Will, A. (2021). Factors driving success in collective action approaches to WASH. USAID. https://www.globalwaters.org/sites/default/files/collective_action_brief_final_508.pdf
  30. Ngure, F. M., Reid, B. M., Humphrey, J. H., Mbuya, M. N., Pelto, G. y Stoltzfus, R. J. (2014). Water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH), environmental enteropathy, nutrition, and early child development: Making the links. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1308(1), 118–128. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12330
  31. Mihelcic, J. R., Naughton, C. C., Verbyla, M. E., Zhang, Q., Schweitzer, R. W., Oakley, S. M., Wells, E. C. y Whiteford, L. M. (2017). The Grandest Challenge of All: The Role of Environmental Engineering to Achieve Sustainability in the World’s Developing Regions. Environmental Engineering Science, 34(1), 16–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2015.0334
  32. Hortelano Villanueva, L. y Hidalgo García, M. del M. (2016). El agua como derecho humano: Retos y limitaciones. Instituto Español de Estudios Estratégicos. https://www.ieee.es/Galerias/fichero/docs_analisis/2016/DIEEEA78-2016_DerechoAgua_MMHG.pdf
  33. Akpabio, E. M. (2012). Water meanings, sanitation practices and hygiene behaviours in the cultural mirror: A perspective from Nigeria. Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development, 2(3), 168–181. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2012.073
  34. Lansburry Hall, N. (2019). Challenges of WASH in remote Australian Indigenous communities. Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development, 9(3), 429-437. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2019.154
  35. Lampoglia, T., Agüero, R. y Barrios, C. (2008). Guía de orientación en saneamiento básico para alcaldes y alcaldesas de municipios rurales y pequeñas comunidades. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. https://sswm.info/sites/default/files/reference_attachments/BARRIOS%20et%20al%202009%20Guia%20de%20orientacion%20alcaldes.pdf?iframeView=true
  36. Pinos, J. y Malo-Larrea, A. (2018, enero). El derecho humano de acceso al agua: una revisión desde el Foro Mundial del Agua y la gestión de los recursos hídricos en Latinoamérica. Invurnus, 13(1), 12-20. https://dspace.uazuay.edu.ec/bitstream/datos/11509/1/%282018%29%20Pinos%20%26%20Malo%20-%20El%20derecho%20humano%20de%20acceso%20al%20agua%20una%20revisi%c3%b3n%20desde%20el%20Foro%20Mundial%20del%20Agua%20y%20la%20gesti%c3%b3n%20de%20recursos%20h%c3%addricos%20en%20Latinoam%c3%a9rica.pdf
  37. Zafra, A., Joaquín, P. y Jauregui, C. (2008). Efectos de los trihalometanos sobre la salud. Higiene y Sanidad Ambiental, 8, 280-290. https://saludpublica.ugr.es/sites/dpto/spublica/public/inline-files/bc51018a2311531_Hig.Sanid_.Ambient.8.280-290%282008%29.pdf
  38. Meinzen-Dick, R. (2007). Beyond panaceas in water institutions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(39), 15200–15205. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702296104
  39. Craun, G. F. y Calderon, R. L. (2001). Waterborne disease Outbreaks Caused by Distribution System Deficiencies. American Water Works Association, 93(9), 64–75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.2001.tb09287.x
  40. Li, Z. (2021). Treatment and technology of domestic sewage for improvement of rural environment in China-Jiangsu: A research. Science Progress and Research, 1(4), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.52152/spr/2021.146
  41. Pérez, L. D. C., González, M. y Clavijo, V. (2022). Diseño de una campaña comunicacional sobre la higiene menstrual como derecho para las niñas de la institución educativa Altos del Rosario sede Sierra Flor ubicada en Sincelejo, Sucre. [Tesis de Pregrado, Universidad de Cartagena]. Repositorio UdeC. doi: https://doi.org/10.57799/11227/3638

Most read articles by the same author(s)