Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

SECTION B: LIFE SCIENCES

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2015)

Herbarium of Economic Botany of Ecuador QUSF: Historical account, development, representativity, and types

DOI
https://doi.org/10.18272/aci.v7i2.250
Submitted
January 22, 2016
Published
2015-12-30

Abstract

The Herbarium of Economic Botany of Ecuador QUSF of Universidad San Francisco de Quito (Ecuador), registered in the Index Herbariorum since 2001, holds over twenty thousand catalogued specimens of 2131 species of Magnoliophyta and Pteridophyta. One third of these specimens keep information on uses and applications of economic value. Asteraceae and Solanaceae are the most represented families in the collection. Almost half of the specimens come from highly diverse Andean cloud forests. The collection has specimens of 23, out of 24, provinces of Ecuador, Pichincha being the most represented province. Seven type specimens of six species are deposited at the QUSF, including the holotypes of Larnax macasiana S. Deanna, Leiva & Barboza, and Tiputinia foetida PE. Berry & C. Woodw. In this article, we present a historic overview of the herbarium, analyse the collection representativity, and describe future development plans.

viewed = 2748 times

References

  1. Funk, V A. 2003. "The Importance of Herbaria". Plant Science Bulletin, 49: 94-95.
  2. Milne, J.; Jolley, H. 2010. "The Importance of Herbarium Records in Documenting the Occurrence and Changing Distribution of the Adventive Moss Species "˜Pseudoscleropodium purum"™ in Victoria". The Victorian Naturalist, 127 (4): 146-210.
  3. Applequist, W. L.; McGlinn, D. J.; Miller, M.; Long, Q. G.; Miller, J. S. 2007. "How well do herbarium data predict the location of present populations? A test using Echinacea species in Missouri". Biodiversity and Conservation, 2007 (16): 1397-1407. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-6737-x.
  4. Ponder, W. F.; Carter, G. A.; Flemons, P.; Chapman, R. R. 2001. "Evaluation of Museum Collection Data for Use in Biodiversity Assessment". Conservation Biology, 15 (3): 648-657. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015003648.x.
  5. Rivers, M. C.; Taylor, L.; Brummitt, N. A.; Meagher, T. R.; Roberts, D. L.; Lughadha, E. N. 2011. "How many herbarium specimens are needed to detect threatened species?" Biological Conservation, 144 (10): 2541-2547. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.07.014.
  6. Rollins, R. C. 1965. "The Role of the University Herbarium in Research and Teaching". Taxon, 14 (4): 115-120.
  7. Funk, V. A.; Hoch, P. C.; Prather, L. A.; Wagner, W. L. 2005. "The Importance of Vouchers". Taxon, 54 (1): 127-129.
  8. Kramer, D. W. 1996. "The use of new technologies to create a visual archive of plant diversity", en: "Sampling the Green World", T. F. Stuessy; S. H. Sohmer (Eds.), Columbia University Press: New York, pp. 99-111.
  9. Missouri Botanical Garden. 2015. "Tropicos". Enlace: http://www.tropicos.org. Missouri Botanical Garden: Missouri, EE.UU. Fecha de consulta: 10 abril 2015
  10. JSTOR. 2015. "JSTOR Global Plants". Enlace: https://plants.jstor.org. JSTOR: EE.UU. Fecha de consulta: 10 abril 2015.
  11. The New York Botanical Garden. 2013. "The C.V. Starr Virtual Herbarium". Enlace: http://sciweb.nybg.org/science2/VirtualHerbarium.asp. The New York Botanical Garden: New York, EE.UU. Fecha de consulta: 10 abril 2015
  12. Royal Botanic Gardens. 2013. "Kew Herbarium". Enlace: http://www.kew.org/science-conservation/collections/herbarium. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew: Londres, Reino Unido. Fecha de consulta: 10 abril 2015.
  13. Thiers, B. 2013. "Index Herbariorum: A global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. Enlace: http://sciweb.nybg.org/Science2/IndexHerbariorum.asp. The New York Botanical Garden: New York, EE.UU. Fecha de consulta: 10 abril 2015
  14. Armijos, M.V.; Zabala, N. A. 2003. "Plantas medicinales promisorias de la Estación de Biodiversidad de Tiputini-USFQ". Memorias del III Congreso Ecuatoriano de Botánica, Funbotánica: Quito.
  15. Ayats, M.; Zabala, N. A. 2003. "Plantas con propiedades plaguicidas en el sur de Imbabura". Memorias del III Congreso Ecuatoriano de Botánica, Funbotánica: Quito.
  16. Weiss-Schneeweiss, H.; Stuessy, T F.; Tremetsberger, K.; Urtubey, E.; Valdebenito, H. A.; Beck, S.G.; Baeza, C.M. 2007. "Chromosome numbers and karyotypes of South American species and populations of Hypochaeris (Asteraceae)". Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 153: 49-60. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2007.00577.x.
  17. Woodward, C.L.; Berry, P.E.; Maas-van de Kamer, H.; Swing, K. 2007. "Tiputinia foetida, a new mycoheterotrophic genus of Thismiaceae from Amazonian Ecuador, and a likely case of deceit pollination". Taxon, 56 (1): 157-162.
  18. Grant, J.R. 2008. "De Macrocarpaeae Grisebach (Ex Gentianaceis) Speciebus Novis VIII: Two New Species from Ecuador". Harvard Papers in Botany, 13 (2): 253-259. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3100/1043-4534-13.2.253.
  19. Salvador-Van Eysenrode, D.; Bogaert, J.; Zak Mnacek, V; Ceulemans, R. 2003. "Sampling Diversity in Canopy Gaps in an Ecuadorian Rain Forest". Forest Science, 49 (6): 909-917.
  20. Grant, J.R. 2007. "De Macrocarpaeae Grisebach (Ex Gentianaceis) Speciebus Novis VII: Four New Species and Two Natural Hybrids". Harvard Papers in Botany, 11 (2): 129-139. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3100/1043-4534(2007)11%5B129:DMGEGS%5D2.0.CO;2.
  21. Grant, J.R. 2011. De Macrocarpaeae Grisebach (Ex Gentianaceis) Speciebus Novis IX: A Synopsis of the Genus in Bolivia. Harvard Papers in Botany 16 (2): 389-397.
  22. K. Tremetsberger, T.F. Stuessy, G. Kadlec, E. Urtubey, C.M. Baeza, S.G. Beck, H.A. Valdebenito, C. De Fátima Ruas, N.I. Matzenbacher. 2006. AFLP Phylogeny of South American Species of Hypochaeris (Asteraceae, Lactuceae). Systematic Botany 31 (3): 610-626.
  23. Struwe, L., S. Haag, E. Heiberg, J.R. Grant. 2009. Andean Speciation and Vicariance in Neotropical Macrocarpaea (Gentianaceae-Helieae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 96 (3): 450-469.
  24. Croat, T.B., J. Lingán, D. Hayworth. 2005. A new section of Anthurium, sect. Decurrentia - Revision of the Anthurium decurrens Poeppig complex in Amazonia. Rodriguésia 56 (88): 15-30.
  25. Grant JR, Struwe L. 2003 De Macrocarpaeae Grisebach (ex Gentianaceis) speciebus novis 3: six new species of moon-gentians (Macrocarpaea, Gentianaceae: Helieae) from Parque Nacional Podocarpus, Ecuador. Harvard Papers in Botany 8. (1): 61-81
  26. Grant, J.R. 2007. De Macrocarpaeae Grisebach (Ex Gentianaceis) Speciebus Novis V: Twenty-three new species largely from Peru, and typification of all species in the genus. Harvard Papers in Botany 9 (1): 11-49.
  27. Grant, J.R., V. Trunz. 201107. De Macrocarpaeae Grisebach (Ex Gentianaceis) Speciebus Novis X: A synopsis of the Genus in MOntane Atlatic Forests of Brazil. Harvard Papers in Botany 16 (2): 399-420.
  28. Struve, L., VA. Albert, M.F. Calió, C. Frasier, K.B. Lepis, K.G. Mathews, J.R. Grant. 2009. Evolutionary patterns in neotropical Heliae (Gentianaceae): evidencia from morphology, chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences. Taxon 58 (2): 479-499.
  29. Kreft, H., N. Koster, W. Küper, J. Nieder, W. Barthlott. 2004. Diversity and biogeography of vascular epiphytes in Western Amazonia, Yasuní, Ecuador. Journal of Biogeography 31: 1463-1476.
  30. Holmgren, P.K. & N.H. Holmgren. Additions to Index Herbariorum (Herbaria), Edition 8 - Eleventh Series. Taxon 50 (2): 603-620.
  31. Ruales, C., J.E. Guevara. 2010. La flora patrimonial de Quito descubierta por la expedición de Humboldt y Bonpland en el año 1802. Avances en Ciencias e Ingenierías 3: B54-B63.
  32. udd, W.S., C.S. Campbell, E.A. Kellogg, P.F.Stevens, and M.J.Donogue. 2007. Plant Systematics: A phylogenetic Approach, 3rd edition. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland Mass.
  33. Ruales, C. 2013. Las colecciones botánicas de Joseph de Jussieu (1736-1747)". Quito, Ecuador: Universidad San Francisco de Quito, serie Monográfica Plantas de Quito - La vegetación original de una ciudad siempre verde, vol. I.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>