Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

SECTION C: ENGINEERING

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2013)

Effect of the substrate as electron donor during the microbial sulfate reduction and its possible applications in the biological treatment of acid mine drainage

DOI
https://doi.org/10.18272/aci.v5i1.128
Submitted
September 29, 2015
Published
2013-04-08

Abstract

The uncontrolled release of acid mine drainage (AMD) characterized by elevated concentrations of dissolved metals, high levels of sulfate ions and low pH values threatens the quality of water resources nearby mining areas worldwide. The development of novel technologies based on the precipitation of metals as metal sulfides catalyzed by sulfate reducing bacteria constitute an important method for the bioremediation ofAMD. The objective ofthis study was to evaluate in batch experiments the efficiency of different organic substrates such as acetate, lactate, ethanol and peptone as electron donors during the generation of biogenic sulfide by different microbial inocula and its possible applications in the bioremediation of AMD. The highest sulfide production activity was obtained with 2.5 g acetate-COD L-1 as substrate, 4000 mg SO4-2 L−1 as electron acceptor and the sediments of an artificial lagoon as bacterial inoculum. The final cumulative sulfide production was 463 mg S2- L-1, the maximum specific sulfide production activity was 9 mg S2- g acetate-1 d-1, and the maximum specific sulfate reduction activity was 52 mg SO4-2 g acetate-1 d-1. In terms of the substrate concentration, a 10-fold increase in the concentration of the electron donor resulted in substrate inhibition significantly decreasing the biogenic sulfide activities. The results of this study indicate that acetate was a highly effective substrate during the microbial sulfate reduction with a potential application in the remediation of acid mine drainage. Moreover, the use of acetate as electron donor favored the sulfate reducing activity through the inhibition ofthe methanogenic activity ofthe microorganisms present in the evaluated microbial inocula.

viewed = 1738 times

References

  1. Neculita; Zagury; Bussiere. 2007. "Passive treatment of acid mine drainage in bioreactors using sulfate-reducing bacteria: critical review and research needs". Journal of Environmental Quality, 36: 1-13.
  2. Sierra-Alvarez; Karri; Freeman. 2006. "Field, Biological Treatment of Heavy Metals in Acid Mine Drainage using Sulfate Reducing Bioreactors". Water Science and Technology, 54: 179-185.
  3. Karnachuk; Pimenov; Yusupov; Frank; Kaksonen; Puhakka; Ivanov; Lindstrom; Tuovinen; Tuovinen. 2005. "Sulfate Reduction Potential in Sediments in the Norilsk". Geomicrobiology Journal, 22: 11-25.
  4. Manoues; Gantzer; Stefan. 2007. "Spatial variation of sediment sulfate reduction rates in saline lake". Journal of Environmental Engineering, 12: 1106-1116.
  5. Vladár; Rusznyák; Márialigeti; Borsodi. 2007. "Diversity of Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria Inhabiting the Rhizosphere of Phragmites australis in Lake Velencei (Hungary) Revealed by a Combined Cultivation-based and Molecular approach". Microbiology Ecology, 56: 64-75.
  6. Ochoa-Herrera; Banihani; León; Khatri; Field; Sierra-Alvarez. 2009. "Toxicity of fluoride to microorganisms in biological wastewater treatment systems". Water Research, 43: 3177-3186.
  7. Metcalf; Eddy. 2003. "Wastewater Enginering Treatment and Reuse". Fourth Edition.
  8. Trüper; Schlege. 1964. "Sulphur Metabolism in Thiorhodaceae I. Quantitative Measurements on Growing Cells of Chromatium okenii". Antonie Leeuwenhoek, 30: 225-238.
  9. Cline. 1969. "Spectrophotometric determination of hydrogen sulfide in natural waters". Limnology and Oceanography, 14: 454-458.
  10. Field. 1987. "Parameters Mesurements". Wageningen Agricultural University.
  11. APHA. 1998. "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater". 20th ed. American Public Health Association: Washington DC.
  12. Skoog; West; Holler; Crouch. 2004. "Fundamentos de Química Analítica". Madrid.
  13. Lide; Frederikse. 1995. "CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics". 6th Edition ed. Boca Raton, FL.
  14. Oluwaseun, O.; Oyekola, R.; Susan, T. 2009. "Study of Anaerobic Lactate Metabolism under Biosulfidogenic Conditions". Water Research, 43: 3345-3354.
  15. Celis, L.; Alpuche-Solís, A.; Ortega-Morales, O.; Razo-Flores, E. 2009. "Characterization of sulfate-reducing bacteria dominated surface communities during start-up of a down-flow fluidized bed reactor". Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 36: 111-121.
  16. Miyazato, N.; Takamatsuand, T. 2006. "Microbial community change of sulfate reduction and sulfur oxidation bacteria in the activated sludge cultivated with acetate and peptone". Water Science & Technology, 54: 111-119.
  17. Kristjansson; Schonheit. 1983. "Why do Sulfate-reducing Bacteria Outcompete Methanogenic Bacteria for Substrates?". Oecologia, 60: 264-266.
  18. Lowe; Jain-Mahendra; Zeikus. 1993. "Biology, Ecology, and Biotechnological Applications of Anaerobic Bacteria Adapted to Environmental Stresses in Temperature, pH, Salinity, or Substrates". Microbiological Reviews, 57: 451-509.

Most read articles by the same author(s)