Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2009)

Human impact on mammal diversity in Secoya Land, Ecuadorian Amazon

DOI
https://doi.org/10.18272/aci.v1i1.2
Submitted
June 23, 2015
Published
2009-04-01

Abstract

To evaluate the impact of hunting on the diversity of mammals in the Secoya land in the northeastern of Ecuador, we using a non-invasive methodology based on the use of "camera traps" located in forests at different distances from Secoya settlements from April to December 2006, we recorded a total of 20 species of mammals, belonging to 14 families. The species with the highest number of records were black agouti Dasyprocta fuliginosa, collared peccary Peccary tajacu and lowland paca Agouti paca. The diversity of species, estimated by the number of species recorded per month, was significantly lower in forests near human settlements than forests away of settlements. We also present preliminary data from the relative abundance of species and their patterns of daily and seasonal activity. The participatory research has facilitated making conscience by Secoya people over the negative impacts of hunting and be a major pillar for the development of a program to managing hunting effective and appropriate to the environmental and cultural reality.

viewed = 1439 times

References

  1. Kinnaird, M.F.; Sanderson, E.W.; O"™Brien, T.G.; Wibisono, H.T.; Woolmer, G. 2003. Deforestation Trends in a Tropical Landscape and Implications for Endangered Large Mammals. Conservation Biology 17: 245-257
  2. Main, M. B.; Richardson, L. W. 2002. Response of wildlife to prescribed fire in southwest Florida pine flatwoods. Wildlife Society Bulletin 30: 213­221
  3. Te Wong S.; Servheen, C.; Ambu, L.; Norhayati, A. 2005. Impacts of fruit production cycles on Malayan sun bears and bearded pigs in lowland tropical forest of Sabah, Malaysian Borneo. Journal of Tropical Ecology 21: 627-639
  4. Peres, C.A. 1990. Effects of Hunting on Western Amazonian Primate Communities. Biological Conservation 54(1): 47-59
  5. Redford, K. 1992. The empty forest. Bioscience 42: 412-422
  6. Redford, K.; Robinson, J.G. 1987. A game of choice: patterns of indian and colonist hunting in the Neotropics. American Anthropologist 89: 650-667
  7. Cincotta, R.P.; Wisnewsli, J.; Engelman, R. 2000. Human population in the biodiversity hotspots. Nature 404: 990-992
  8. WCS 2006. Efectos de las carreteras sobre la fauna silvestre en el Parque Nacional Yasuní.. WCS Programa Ecuador. Boletín 1
  9. de la Torre, S.; Payaguaje, H.; Payaguaje, P.; Payaguaje, A. 2007. Investigación participativa y conservación de la fauna en tierras Secoya. En: Caminando en el sendero, hacia la conservación del ambiente y la cultura Secoya. S. de la Torre y P. Yépez (eds). Fundación VIHOMA. Quito. pp. 77-90
  10. Pinto, L.C.; Andriolo, A. 2005. Camera traps used on the mastofaunal survey of Araras Biological Reserve, IEF-RJ. Revista Brasileira Zoociencias Juiz de Fora 7: 231-246
  11. de la Torre, S., Yépez, P. (eds). 2007. Caminando en el sendero, hacia la conservación del ambiente y la cultura Secoya. Fundación VIHOMA. Quito.
  12. Palacios, W.; Cerón, C.E.; Valencia, R.; Sierra, R. 1999. Las Formaciones Naturales de la Amazonia del Ecuador. En: Propuesta Preliminar de un Sistema de Clasificación de Vegetación para el Ecuador Continental. R. Sierra (ed.). Quito. pp. 109-119
  13. Emmons, L.H.; Feer, F. 1990. Neotropical rainforest mammals, a field guide. 1era. Edición. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
  14. Tirira D. 1999. Mamíferos del Ecuador. Museo de Zoología (QCAZ) / Centro de Biodiversidad y Ambiente / Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador / SIMBIOE. Quito
  15. Vickers, W. 1989. Los Sionas y Secoyas, su adaptación al ambiente amazónico. Editorial Abya- Yala, Quito
  16. Howe, H.F. 1984. Implications of seed dispersal by animals for tropical reserve management. Biological Conservation 30: 261-281