Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

SECTION C: ENGINEERING

Vol. 13 No. 2 (2021)

Automated Vigor Estimation on Vineyards

DOI
https://doi.org/10.18272/aci.v13i2.2367
Submitted
June 23, 2021
Published
2021-12-15

Abstract

Estimating the balance or vigor in vines, as the yield to pruning weight relation, is a useful parameter that growers use to better prepare for the harvest season and to establish precision agriculture management of the vineyard, achieving specific site planification like pruning, debriefing or budding. Traditionally growers obtain this parameter by first manually weighting the pruned canes during the vineyard dormant season (no leaves); second during the harvest collect the weight of the fruit for the vines evaluated in the first step and then correlate the two measures. Since this is a very manual and time-consuming task, growers usually obtain this number by just taking a couple of samples and extrapolating this value to the entire vineyard, losing all the variability present in theirs fields, which imply loss in information that can lead to specific site management and consequently grape quality and quantity improvement. In this paper we develop a computer vision-based algorithm that is robust to differences in trellis system, varieties and light conditions; to automatically estimate the pruning weight and consequently the variability of vigor inside the lot. The results will be used to improve the way local growers plan the annual winter pruning, advancing in the transformation to precision agriculture. Our proposed solution doesn\textsc{\char13}t require to weight the shoots (also called canes), creating prescription maps (detail instructions for pruning, harvest and other management decisions specific for the location) based in the estimated vigor automatically. Our solution uses Deep Learning (DL) techniques to get the segmentation of the vine trees directly from the image captured on the field during dormant season

viewed = 355 times

References

  1. M. Diago, M. Krasnow, M. Bubola, B. Millan, and J. Tardaguila. Assessment of vineyard canopy porosity using machine vision. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, pp. 229- 238 v. 67, 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2015.15037
  2. M. P. Diago, A. SanzGarcia, B. Millan, J. Blasco, and J. Tardaguila. Assessment of flower number per inflorescence in grapevine by image analysis under field con-ditions. J. Sci. Food Agric., 94, 2014. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6512
  3. K. Divilov, T. Wiesner-Hanks, P. Barba, L. Cadle-Davidson, and B. I. Reisch. Computer vision for high-throughput quantitative phenotyping: A case study of grapevine downy mildew sporulation and leaf trichomes. Phytopathology, 107(12): 1549-1555., 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-04-17-0137-R
  4. F. P. Georgiana and S. V. G. Gui. An automatically crown-truck segmentation in tree drawing test. 11th International Symposium on Electronics and Telecommu-nications (ISETC)At: Timisoara, Romania, 2014. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISETC.2014.7010804
  5. R. Girshick, I. Radosavovic, G. Gkioxari, P. Doll 'ar, and K. He. Detectron. https://github.com/facebookresearch/detectron, 2018.
  6. K. He, G. Gkioxari, P. Doll'ar, and R. B. Girshick. Mask R-CNN. 2017.
  7. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.06870
  8. I. Inc. Intel realsense, https://www.intelrealsense.com/. Intel Inc, 4 2020.
  9. W. Ji, X. Meng, Z. Qian, B. Xu, and D. Zhao. Branch localization method based on the skeleton feature extraction and stereo matching for apple harvesting robot. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1729881417705276
  10. J. Kirchener. Automatic image-based determination of pruning mass as determinant for yield potential in grape vine management. J. Sci. Food Agric., 94, 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajgw.12243
  11. A. Kornilov and I. Safonov. An overview of watershed algorithm implementations in open source libraries. Journal of Imaging, 4:123, 10 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging4100123
  12. J. Long, E. Shelhamer, and T. Darrell. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. CoRR, 2014. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1411.4038.
  13. Y. Majeed, J. Zhang, X. Zhang, L. Fu, M. Karkee, Q. Zhang, and M. D. Whiting. Apple tree trunk and branch segmentation for automatic trellis training using convolutional neural network based semantic segmentation. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51, 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.064
  14. K. Maninis, S. Caelles, J. Pont-Tuset, and L. V. Gool. Deep extreme cut: From extreme points to object segmentation. CoRR, 2017. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1711.09081
  15. nsf. National artificial intelligence (ai) research institutes. AI-Driven Innovation in Agriculture and the Food System, 2019.
  16. M. Orr, O. Grillo, G. Venora, and B. G. Seed morphocolorimetric analysis by computer vision: a helpful tool to identify grapevine (vitis vinifera l.) cultivars. Australian Journal of Wine and Grape Research Pages: 508-519, 2015. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajgw.12153
  17. QGIS Development Team. QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation, 2009.
  18. L. Ravaz. Sur la brunissure de la vigne. Les Comptes Rendus de lAcadmie des Sciences, 136:1276-1278, 10 1903.
  19. C.-H. Teng, Y.-S. Chen, , and W.-H. Hsu. Tree segmentation from an image. Conference: Proceedings of the IAPR Conference on Machine Vision Applications, 2005.
  20. N. Xu, B. L. Price, S. Cohen, and T. S. Huang. Deep image matting. CoRR, 2017. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.03872