Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

SECTION A: EXACT SCIENCES

Vol. 7 No. 1 (2015)

Causal behaviour on Carter Spacetime

DOI
https://doi.org/10.18272/aci.v7i1.218
Submitted
November 24, 2015
Published
2015-05-22

Abstract

In this work we will focus on the causal character of Carter Spacetime (see [2], [10]). The importance of this spacetime is the following: for the causally best well behaved spacetimes (the globally hyperbolic ones), there are several characterizations or alternative definitions.

In some cases, it has been shown that some of the causal properties required in these characterizations can be weakened. But Carter spacetime provides a counterexample for an impossible relaxation in one of them. We studied the possibility of Carter spacetime to be a counterexample for impossible lessening in another characterization, based on the previous results.

In particular, we will prove that the time-separation or Lorentzian distance between two chosen points in Carter spacetime is infinite. Although this spacetime turned out not to be the counterexample we were looking for, the found result is interesting per se and provides ideas for alternate approaches to the possibility of weakening the mentioned characterization.

viewed = 821 times

References

  1. Bemal, A.; Sánchez, M. 2007. "Globally hyperbolic spacetimes can be defined as causal instead of strongly causal", Class. Quant. Grav., 24: 745-750.
  2. Carter, B. 1971. "Causal structure in space-time", Gen. Rel. Grav., 1 (4): 337-406.
  3. Minguzzi, E.; Sánchez, M. 2008. "The Causal Hierarchy of Spacetimes", Recent developments in pseudo-Riemannian geometry, ESI Lect. Math. Phys: 299-358.
  4. Beem, J.; Ehrlich, P.; Easley, K. 1996. "Global Lorentzian Geometry", Pure and Applied Math. Marcel Dekker. 202.
  5. Galloway, G. 1983. "Causality Violations in Spatially Closed Spacetimes", Gen. Rel. Grav. 15 (2).
  6. García-Parrado, A.; Senovilla, J. 2003. "Causal relationship: a new tool for the causal characterization of Lorentzian manifolds." Class. Quantum Grav. 20: 625-664.
  7. García-Parrado, A.; Senovilla, J. 2005. "Causal structures and causal boundaries." Class. Quantum Grav. 22: R1-R84.
  8. García-Parrado, A.; Sánchez, M. 2005. "Further properties of causal relationship: causal structure stability, new criteria for isocausality and counterexamples", Class. Quantum Grav. 22: 4589-4619.
  9. Geroch, R. 1966 "Singularities in Closed Universes", Phys. Rev. Lett. 17: 445-447.
  10. Hawking, S.; Ellis, G. 1973. "The large structure of spacetime." Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
  11. Leray, J. 1952. "Hyperbolic differential equations, duplicated notes." Princeton Institute for Advances Studies.
  12. O"™neill, B. 1983. "Semi-Riemannian Geometry", San Diego: Academic Press.
  13. Senovilla, J. 1998. "Singularity theorems and their consequences", Gen. Rel. Grav. 30: 701-848.
  14. Wald, R. 1984. "General Relativity." Univ. Chicago Press.