Abstract
The Mw 8.8 Kamchatka earthquake of July 29, 2025, represents one of the largest seismic events recorded in the Kuril-Kamchatka subduction zone. This study synthesizes and compares the focal mechanism solutions reported by major seismological agencies to derive a representative consensus double-couple solution and to model the coseismic deformation fields generated by the rupture. The angular quadratic mean difference among strike, dip, and rake parameters was used as the main metric of similarity between mechanisms. The consensus solution (strike= 203.5°, dip = 22.7°, rake= 70.1°) is consistent with megathrust faulting on the subduction interface. Based on the USGS finite rupture model, surface displacement and strain fields were computed using Okada’s (1985) elastic dislocation formulation. The results reveal horizontal displacements toward the trench, vertical subsidence to the northwest, and uplift to the southwest of the epicenter, with strain patterns correlating with aftershock distribution. The low angular dispersion (maximum rotation = 28.4°) confirms convergence among agency solutions. These findings contribute to a more reliable representation of rupture parameters and support regional seismic hazard modeling.
References
Zobin, V. M. (1996). Apparent stress of earthquakes within the shallow subduction zone near Kamchatka Peninsula. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 86(3), 811-820. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0860030811
USGS (2025). M 8.8 – 2025 Kamchatka Peninsula, Russia earthquake. U.S. Geological Survey. https://earthquake.usgs. gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000qw60/executive
Kaila, K. L., & Krishna, V. G. (1984). Upper mantle velocity structure in the Kurile Islands, Kamchatka, and the Sea of Okhotsk regions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 74(6), 2269-2296. https://doi.org/10.1785/ BSSA0740062269
USGS (2025). M 7.4 – 2025 Eastern Kamchatka, Russia earthquake. U.S. Geological Survey. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/ earthquakes/eventpage/us7000qdyl/executivehttps://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us7000qdyl/ executive
U.S. Geological Survey (2025). M 7.0 – 102 km E of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, Russia. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/ earthquakes/eventpage/us7000n7n8/executive
Johnson, J. M., & Satake, K. (1999). Asperity distribution of the 1952 great Kamchatka earthquake and its relation to future earthquake potential in Kamchatka. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 154(3), 541-553. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s000240050243
MacInnes, B. T., Weiss, R., Bourgeois, J., & Pinegina, T. K. (2010). Slip distribution of the 1952 Kamchatka great earthquake based on near-field tsunami deposits and historical records. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 100(4), 1695-1709. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120090376
Pérez, O. J. (2000). Kuril Islands Arc: Two seismic cycles of great earthquakes during which the complete history of seismicity (M s≥ 6) is observed. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 90(4), 1096-1100. https://doi. org/10.1785/0119990063
Cui, Q., Zhou, Y., Liu, L., Gao, Y., Li, G., & Zhang, S. (2023). The topography of the 660-km discontinuity beneath the Kuril-Kamchatka: Implication for morphology and dynamics of the northwestern Pacific slab. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2022.117967
Brandl, C. C., Worthington, L. L., Roland, E. C., Walton, M. A., Nedimović, M. R., Gase, A. C., Adejedi, O., Castillo Castellanos, J., Phrampus, B. J., Bostock, M. G., Wang, K., & Oliva, S. J. (2025). Seismic imaging reveals a strain-partitioned sliver and nascent megathrust at an incipient subduction zone in the northeast Pacific. Science Advances, 11(29). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adt3003
Calais, E., Han, J. Y., DeMets, C., & Nocquet, J. M. (2006). Deformation of the North American plate interior from a decade of continuous GPS measurements. Journal of geophysical research: solid earth, 111(B6). https://doi. org/10.1029/2005JB004253
Lay, T. (2018). A review of the rupture characteristics of the 2011 Tohoku-oki Mw 9.1 earthquake. Tectonophysics, 733, 4-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2017.09.022
Tajima, F., Mori, J., & Kennett, B. L. (2013). A review of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake (Mw 9.0): Large-scale rupture across heterogeneous plate coupling. Tectonophysics, 586, 15-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2012.09.014
Hayes, G. P., Smoczyk, G. M., Villaseñor, A. H., Furlong, K. P., & Benz, H. M. (2020). Seismicity of the Earth 1900–2018 (No. 3446). US Geological Survey. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/sim3446
Vassileva, M. S., Motagh, M., Walter, T. R., Wetzel, H. U., & Senyukov, S. L. (2020). The 29 March 2017 Yuzhno‐ Ozernovskoe Kamchatka Earthquake: Fault Activity in An Extension of the East Kamchatka Fault Zone as Constrained by InSAR Observations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 110(3), 1101-1114. https://doi. org/10.1785/0120190174
Styron, R., & Pagani, M. (2020). The GEM global active faults database. Earthquake Spectra, 36, 160-180. https://doi. org/10.1177/8755293020944182
Swenson, J. L., & Beck, S. L. (1999). Source characteristics of the 12 November 1996 Mw 7.7 Peru subduction zone earthquake. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 154(3), 731-751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s000240050250
NOAA. (2025). Estimated tsunami travel times to coastal locations. National Centers for Environmental Information. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/maps/ttt_coastal_locations https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/maps/ttt_coastal_locations/
Hardebeck, J. L., & Shearer, P. M. (2002). A new method for determining first-motion focal mechanisms. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 92(6), 2264-2276. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120010200
Okada, Y. (1985). Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 75(4), 1135–1154. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0750041135

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Amilcar Carrera Cevallos
