Keywords
biomass
catalytic dehydration
electrocatalysis
potato
waste valorization
How to Cite
Abstract
Ecuador, a country highly dependent on its oil industry, faces the need to import petroleum derivatives due to the lack of a developed petrochemical sector. This study comparatively assesses the technical, economic, and environmental feasibility of three routes for ethylene production, focusing on more sustainable and environmentally friendly processes. The first, the traditional linear process based on thermal cracking of naphtha, is noted for its technological maturity and lower initial costs, but operates under the "extract, produce, dispose" sequence, leading to a high environmental impact due to the substantial energy required and significant greenhouse gas emissions. In contrast, the two proposed circular routes utilize potato agricultural waste as biomass for bio-ethylene production: (a) fermentation to obtain bioethanol followed by catalytic dehydration and (b) electrocatalysis of methane derived from residual biomass. The study's results indicate that while these routes face technical and economic challenges, such as low yields, additional equipment for raw material processing, and higher initial costs, they offer environmental benefits aligned with green chemistry principles, including carbon emission reduction, use of renewable raw materials, and increased energy efficiency. Of the two circular processes analyzed, fermentation is considered the more applicable option due to biomass availability and process maturity in the local industry, despite having a cost 2.6 times higher than the linear process. While naphtha-based ethylene production remains the most viable in economic and technological terms, the development of a sustainable bio-ethylene industry still faces challenges in scalability, yields, and high initial costs but would allow the valorization of agricultural waste, diversifying the country's production matrix and positioning Ecuador as a leader in green innovation in Latin America.
References
Bocco, A. M. (1987). Auge petrolero, modernización y subdesarrollo: el Ecuador de los años setenta. Quito: FLACSO Ecuador: Corporación Editora Nacional.
Fontaine, G. (2002). Sobre las bonanzas y dependencia del Petróleo y enfermedad holandesa en el Ecuador. Iconos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, (13), 102-110.
Banco Central del Ecuador. (2023). Análisis del sector petrolero. https://contenido.bce.fin.ec/documentos/Estadisticas/Hidrocarburos/ASP202302.pdf
Benalcázar Ordóñez, F. J. (2025). Desafíos y oportunidades de la industria petrolera en Ecuador. Revista InveCom, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14816573
Allaica, J. C. M. (2018). La ecología industrial y la economía circular. Retos actuales al desarrollo de industrias básicas en el Ecuador. Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores.
Kulprathipanja, S., Rekoske, J., Wei, D., Solen, R., Pham, T. V. y Liu, C. (2021). Petrochemical markets. En Modern petrochemical technology (pp. 17–42). Wiley.
Worrell, E., D. Phylipsen, D. Einstein, and N. Martin. (2000). Energy Use and Energy Intensity of the U.S. Chemical Industry. https://doi.org/10.2172/773773
Alshammari, A., Kalevaru, V. N., Bagabas, A., & Martin, A. (2016). Production of ethylene and its commercial importance in the global market. En Petrochemical catalyst materials, processes, and emerging technologies (pp. 82-115). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9975-5.ch004
Fan, D., Dai, D.-J., & Wu, H.-S. (2012). Ethylene formation by catalytic dehydration of ethanol with industrial considerations. Materials, 6(1), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma6010101
Sundaram, K. M., Shreehan, M. M., & Olszewski, E. F. (2010). Ethylene. In Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology (pp. 1–39). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471238961.0520082519211404.a01.pub3
The Observatory of Economy Complexity. (October 11, 2025). Ethylene Polymers in Ecuador. https://oec.world/es/profile/bilateral-product/ethylene-polymers/reporter/ecu
Yan, Y., Pang, Y. X., Luo, X., Lin, Q., Pang, C. H., Zhang, H., Gao, X., & Wu, T. (2024). Carbon dioxide-focused greenhouse gas emissions from petrochemical plants and associated industries: Critical overview, recent advances and future prospects of mitigation strategies. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 188, 406–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2024.05.136
Opia, A. C., Hamid, M. K. B. A., Syahrullail, S., Rahim, A. B. A., & Johnson, C. A. N. (2021). Biomass as a potential source of sustainable fuel, chemical and tribological materials. Overview. Materials Today: Proceedings, 39, 922–928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.045
Vaithyanathan, V. K., Goyette, B., & Rajagopal, R. (2023). A critical review of the transformation of biomass into commodity chemicals: Prominence of pretreatments. Environmental Challenges, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2023.100700
Dong, X., Lu, D., Fan, Q., & Gong, H. (2023). Mechanisms of ethanol dehydration to ethylene on γ-Al₂O₃ (100) and (110C): A combined DFT and KMC study. Computational Materials Science, 219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111979
Zhang, M., & Yu, Y. (2013). Dehydration of ethanol to ethylene. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 52(28), 9505–9514. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie401157c
Irfan, M., Nadeem, M., & Syed, Q. (2014). Ethanol production from agricultural wastes using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 45(2), 457–465. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822014000200012
Priyanka, M., Kumar, D., Shankar, U., Yadav, A., & Yadav, K. (2018). Agricultural waste management for bioethanol production. En Handbook of research on microbial tools for environmental waste management (pp. 1-33). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3540-9.ch001
Sarkar, N., Ghosh, S. K., Bannerjee, S., & Aikat, K. (2012). Bioethanol production from agricultural wastes: An overview. Renewable Energy, 37(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.06.045
Chen, Y., Kuo, M. J., Lobo, R., & Ierapetritou, M. (2024). Ethylene production: Process design, techno-economic and life-cycle assessments. Green Chemistry, 26(5), 2903–2911. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3GC03858K
Rahimpour, M. R., J. M., & I. D. (2013). Progress in catalytic naphtha reforming process: A review. Applied Energy, 109, 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.080
Silva, A. P., Bahú, J. O., Soccol, R., Rodríguez-Urrego, L., Fajardo-Moreno, W. S., Moya, H., León-Pulido, J., & Cárdenas Concha, V. O. (2023). Naphtha characterization (PIONA, density, distillation curve and sulfur content): An origin comparison. Energies, 16(8), 3568. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083568
EP Petroecuador. (2021). Informe Estadístico anual 2021. https://www.eppetroecuador.ec/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/INFORME-ESTADISTICO-ANUAL-2021.pdf
Geissdoerfer, M., Pieroni, M. P. P., Pigosso, D. C. A., & Soufani, K. (2020). Circular business models: A review. Journal of cleaner production, 277, 123741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123741
Iqbal, M. W., Kang, Y., & Jeon, H. W. (2020). Zero waste strategy for green supply chain management with minimization of energy consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118827
Cavallieri, M. S., Viles, E., & Montoya-Torres, J. R. (2024). Integration of sustainable production criteria into production scheduling: a systematic search and a critical review. ICORES, 1. https://www.scitepress.org/Link.aspx?doi=10.5220/0012306000003639
Malehmirchegini, L., & Chapman, A. J. (2025). Strategies for achieving carbon neutrality within the chemical industry. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 217, 115762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.115762
Zhang, M., & Yu, Y. (2013). Dehydration of ethanol to ethylene. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 52(28), 9505–9514. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie401157c
Seifzadeh Haghighi, S., Rahimpour, M. R., Raeissi, S., & Dehghani, O. (2013). Investigation of ethylene production in naphtha thermal cracking plants in presence of steam and carbon dioxide. Chemical engineering journal, 228, 1158–1167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.05.048
Meindersma, G. W. (2014). Extraction of aromatics from naphtha with ionic liquids. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241875069
Chuquin Yepez, H. G. (2018). Alternativas de uso de la papa de desecho en la provincia del Carchi y la contaminación con plástico. SATHIRI, 2, 11. https://doi.org/10.32645/13906925.206
Davis, R. A. (2007). Parameter estimation for simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of food waste into ethanol using Matlab Simulink. En Biotechnology for fuels and chemicals: Proceedings of the Twenty-ninth Symposium on Biotechnology for fuels and chemicals held April 29–May 2, 2007, in Denver, Colorado (pp. 379–389). Humana Press.
Mohsenzadeh, A., Z. A., & T. M. J. (2017). Bioethylene production from ethanol: A review and techno-economical evaluation. ChemBioEng Reviews, 4(2), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/cben.201600025
Parawira, W., Murto, M., Zvauya, R., & Mattiasson, B. (2004). Anaerobic batch digestion of solid potato waste alone and in combination with sugar beet leaves. Renewable Energy, 29(11), 1811–1823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2004.02.005
Zhang, Q., Li, W., Peng, J., Xue, L., & He, G. (2024). Cold plasma activated Ni⁰/Ni²⁺ interface catalysts for efficient electrocatalytic methane oxidation to low-carbon alcohols. Green Chemistry, 26(12), 7091–7100. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4GC00289J
Kratky, L., & Zamazal, P. (2020). Economic feasibility and sensitivity analysis of fish waste processing biorefinery. Journal of Cleaner Production, 243, 118677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118677
Torres, M. D., Fradinho, P., Rodríguez, P., Falqué, E., Santos, V., & Domínguez, H. (2020). Biorefinery concept for discarded potatoes: recovery of starch and bioactive compounds. Journal of Food Engineering, 275, 109886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2019.109886
INIAP. (2002). El cultivo de la papa en Ecuador. https://cipotato.org/wp-content/uploads/Documentacion%20PDF/Pumisacho%20y%20Sherwood%20Cultivo%20de%20Papa%20en%20Ecuador.pdf
Herrera, M., Hathman, C. and Galo C. (1999). Estudio sobre el subsector de la papa en el Ecuador. https://cipotato.org/wp-content/uploads/Documentacion%20PDF/subsector_papa_2da.pdf
Liu, Q., Tarn, R., Lynch, D., & Skjodt, N. (2007). Physicochemical properties of dry matter and starch from potatoes grown in Canada. Food Chemistry, 105(3), 897–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.04.034
Alqaheem, Y. (2021). A simulation study for the treatment of Kuwait sour gas by membranes. Heliyon, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05953
Jimenez-Gutierrez, J. M., Verlinden, R. A. J., van der Meer, P. C., van der Wielen, L. A. M., & Straathof, A. J. J. (2021). Liquid hot water pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass at lab and pilot scale. Processes, 9(9), 1518. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9091518
Sinnott, R., & Towler, G. (2020). Costing and project evaluation. Chemical engineering design. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102599-4.00006-0
Hodson de Jaramillo, E. (2018). Bioeconomía: el futuro sostenible. Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, 42(164), 188–201. https://doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.650
Lv, J., Wang, D., Peng, L., Guo, X., Ding, W., & Yang, W. (2023). Ethanol dehydration to ethylene over high-energy facets exposed gamma alumina. Catalysts, 13(6), 994. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13060994
Soh, J. C., Chong, S. L., Hossain, S. S., & Cheng, C. K. (2017). Catalytic ethylene production from ethanol dehydration over non-modified and phosphoric acid modified Zeolite H-Y (80) catalysts. Fuel Processing Technology, 158, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.12.012
Winterton, N. (2001). Twelve more green chemistry principles. Green Chemistry, 3(6). https://doi.org/10.1039/b110187k
Rosero-Rosero, M., Rosero-Rosero, C. C., & Pinargote-Yépez, M. (2024). Costos y decisiones financieras asociadas a la transición de economía lineal a circular en la producción de envases. El caso de Ecuador. Innovar: Revista de ciencias administrativas y sociales, 34(94), 1-24. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27367211
Wechselberger, P., Seifert, A., & Herwig, C. (2010). PAT method to gather bioprocess parameters in real-time using simple input variables and first principle relationships. Chemical Engineering Science, 65(21), 5734–5746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2010.05.002
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Gabriel Vaca, Sonia Quiroga Quisaguano, Kimberly Rizzo, Dimas Pincay, José Alvarez-Barreto