Bioeconomy of biopolymers based on domestic organic waste to reduce the environmental impact generated by disposable plastic waste in the Pasaje Amador Building in the city of Quito.: Bioeconomy of biopolymers
PDF (Spanish)
HTML (Spanish)
XML (Spanish)

Keywords

enviroment
bioeconomy
plastic
biopolymers
polymers
pollution
biotechnology

How to Cite

Hernández, A., & Rojo Gutiérrez, M. A. (2023). Bioeconomy of biopolymers based on domestic organic waste to reduce the environmental impact generated by disposable plastic waste in the Pasaje Amador Building in the city of Quito.: Bioeconomy of biopolymers. ACI Avances En Ciencias E Ingenierías, 15(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.18272/aci.v15i1.2719

Abstract

Bioeconomy of biopolymers based on domestic organic waste: A model to reduce the environmental impact generated by single-use plastic waste in the Pasaje Amador Building in the city of Quito, is a research project that seeks to contribute to a transformation of a "linear" paradigm to a "circular" paradigm, becoming a challenge due to the obstacles for bioprocesses and bioproducts to develop. The main objective of the study was to know the importance and benefit of designing and implementing a bioeconomy model for the design of biopolymers from domestic organic waste. The methodology is of a mixed nature, the study was carried out in the Pasaje Amador Building located in the city of Quito, Ecuador. The sample size for the investigation was fifteen microenterprises, ten offices and ten departments. The investigation began with a data collection phase, through a questionnaire, which was subjected to statistical reliability tests, continuing with an experimental phase where the biopolymer was designed, from organic waste. For the experimental phase, four experimental tests were carried out to that the results present reliability, using a non-probabilistic analysis, within the experimentation the intentional manipulation of variables (independent), measurement of variables (dependent), control and validity, comparison groups were taken into account. The design was finally evaluated through a product satisfaction questionnaire, applied to the study sample, to validate the impact of the insertion of biopolymers in the Amador Passage compared to single-use plastics. The conclusion of the satisfaction survey affirmed the positive hypothesis of the research that the Bioeconomy model of biopolymers from domestic organic waste, allows to reduce the environmental impact generated by single-use plastic waste in Pasaje Amador Building, in Quito

PDF (Spanish)
HTML (Spanish)
XML (Spanish)

References

Orejuela, L. (2019). Relación de la economía circular, la tecnología cero desechos, la bioeconomía, la biorrefinería y el desarrollo sostenible y sustentable. Ñawpay Revista técnica tecnológica, 1 (1), 38- 47. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338221895_Relacion_de_la_Economia_Circular_la_Tecnologia_Cero_Desechos_la_Bioeconomia_la_Biorrefineria_y_el_Desarrollo_Sostenible_y_Sustentable

Birner, R. (2018). Bioeconomy Concepts. En I. Lewandowski (Ed.), Bioeconomy. Springer, Cham. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68152-8_3

Philp, J. (2018). The bioeconomy, the challenge of the century for policy makers. New Biotechnology, 40, 11-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2017.04.004

Borja, F (2019). Tough and Functional Cross-linked Bioplastics from Sheep Wool Keratin. Scientific reports, 9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51393-5

Eibes, P. M., y Gabel, F. (2021). Floating microplastic debris in a rural river in Germany: Distribution, types and potential sources and sinks. Science of The Total Environment, 816, 151641. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151641

Georgescu-Roegen, N. (2017). Bioeconomía: una nueva mirada a la naturaleza de la actividad económica. Revista de economía critica, 1(23), 152-168. https://revistaeconomiacritica.org/index.php/rec/article/view/139

Organización de las Naciones Unidas. (2015). Agenda 2030 para el Desarrollo Sostenible. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/es/2018/06/la-agenda-de-desarrollo-sostenible-necesita-un-impulso-urgente-paraalcanzar-sus-objetivos/

Behar, D. (2008). Introducción a la Metodología de la Investigación. Editorial Shalom.

Collado, C., y Baptista Lucio, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. Mc Graw Hill.

Frías, D. (2019). Apuntes de consistencia interna de las puntuaciones de un instrumento de medida. Universidad de Valencia. https://www.uv.es/friasnav/AlfaCronbach.pdf

Hernández-Sampieri, R., Fernández, C. y Baptista, M. P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. Sexta Edición. McGraw-Hill Interamericana.

Riera, M. (2021). Bioeconomía como modelo de negocio en el Ecuador. Compendium. 24(46). https://www.redalyc.org/journal/880/88067978005/html/

Lengyel, M. y Zanazzi, L. (2020). Bioeconomía y desarrollo en la Argentina: oportunidades y decisiones estratégicas. CIECTI. http://www.ciecti.org.ar/04-bioeconomia-y-desarrollo-en-la-argentina-oportunidades-y-decisiones-estrategicas/

Torres M. y Santos-Ordóñez E. (2020). Ecuador, Modern Biotechnology in Ecuador Development and Legal Framework. En A. Chaurasia D.L. Hawksworth y M. Pessoa de Miranda (Eds.), GMOs. Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation, vol 19 (p.533-540). Springer Cham. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53183-6_29

Krauss, J.B. y Kuttenkeuler, D. (2018). Intellectual property rights derived from academic research and their role in the modern bioeconomy—A guide for scientists. New Biotechnology, 40, 133-139. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2017.06.013

Rodríguez, A., Mondaini, A. y Hitschfeld, M. (2017). Bioeconomía en América Latina y el Caribe: Contexto global y regional y perspectivas. Cepal. https://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/42427-bioeconomia-america-latina-caribecontexto-global-regional-perspectivas

Consejo Alemán de Bioeconomía – BÖR (2017). Bioeconomy policies and strategies established by 2017. Diagram prepared by the German Bioeconomy Council (Bioökonomierat – BÖR). BÖR. http://biooekonomierat.de/en/intertional0/

Consejo Alemán de Bioeconomía - BÖR. (2018). BioeconomyPolicy (Part III) Update Report of National Strategies around the World. A report from the German Bioeconomy Council. BÖR. http://gbs2018.comfileadmin/gbs2018/Downloads/

GBS_2018_Bioeconomy-Strategies-around-the_World_Part-III.pdf

Global Bioeconomy Summit – GBS. 2015. (2015). Conference Report. For a Global Sustainable Bioeconomy. GBS. https://gbs2020.net/history-2015/

Global Bioeconomy Summit – GBS. 2018. (2018). Communiqué. Global Bioeconomy Summit 2018 - Innovation in the Global Bioeconomy for Sustainable and Inclusive Transformation and Wellbeing. GBS. http://gbs2018.com/fileadmin/gbs2018/Downloads/GBS_2018_Communique.pdf

MINCyT. (2015). La bioeconomía en la Argentina: Oportunidades y desafíos. Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Productiva de Argentina. Temas de discusión en el marco de la Red de Estudios en Bioeconomía del Conicet. http://www.cursobioeconomia.mincyt.gob.ar/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/TEMAS-DE-DISCUSI%C3%93N-EN-ELMARCO-DE-LA-RED-DE-ESTUDIOS-EN-BIOECONOM%C3%8DA-DEL-CONICET-ABRIL2015.pdf

Shruthy, R., Preetha, R., y Sreejit, V. (2022). Biodegradable nano composite reinforced with cellulose nano fiber from coconut industry waste for replacing synthetic plastic food packaging. Chemosphere, 291, 132786. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2021.132786

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Andrea Hernández, Marco Antonio Rojo Gutiérrez