Vol. 8 (2022): post(s)
Praxis

Objeto X- - - - - - -

HTML (Español (España)) XML (Español (España)) PDF (Español (España))
  • Colectivo TRES
Colectivo TRES
Autor
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18272/posts.v8i8.2709

Published 2022-12-15

Keywords

  • heterogeneos materialities,
  • space debris,
  • alien phenomenology,
  • object oriented ontology,
  • actor - network theory

How to Cite

TRES, C. (2022). Objeto X- - - - - - -. Post(s), 8(1), 191–214. https://doi.org/10.18272/posts.v8i8.2709

Copyright (c) 2022 Colectivo Tres

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Dr. Novak was the only one to witness object X upon its impact on  Earth. This incident changed world history forever. Object X was able to mobilize work groups, coordinate intercontinental and space studies, and bring the most differentiated positions together to deliberate. Through a speculative fabulation that includes different voices, this narration explores the paradigms of materiality and interpretation to establish the uncertain character of matter as a structuring principle.



HTML (Español (España)) XML (Español (España)) PDF (Español (España))

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Bogost, I. (2012). Alien phenomenology, or, What it’s like to be a thing. University of Minnesota Press. Borges, J. L. (2019). El Aleph. Lumen.
  2. Bryant, L. (2011). The democracy of objects (Primera edición). Open Humanities Press.
  3. Cresswell, T. (2004). Place: A short introduction (2006a ed.). Blackwell Publishing.
  4. Etimologías de Chile, http://etimologias.dechile.net/
  5. Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
  6. Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
  7. Harman, G. (2015). Hacia el realismo especulativo: Ensayos y conferencias (C. Iglesias, trad.). Caja negra.
  8. Herod, A. (2011). Scale. Routledge.
  9. Hodder, I. (2014). The Entanglements of Humans and Things: A Long-Term View. New Literary History 45(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2014.0005
  10. Latour, B. (2004). Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Con- cern. Critical Inquiry 30(2), 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1086/421123
  11. Law, J. (2000). Objects, Spaces and Others. Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University, Lancas- ter, 1–13.
  12. Law, J. (2007). Making a Mess with Method. En The SAGE Handbook of Social Science Methodolo- gy (pp. 595–606). SAGE Publications Ltd.
  13. Mōkito Ōtākou, W. (s/f). Otago Micro and Nanoscales Imaging. University of Otago. https:// www.otago.ac.nz/omni/electron-microscopy/tem-techniques.html
  14. Phelan, P. (1993). Unmarked: The politics of performance. Routledge.
  15. Star, S. L., y Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional Ecology, “Translations” and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science 19(3), 387–420. JSTOR.
  16. Stucchi, L., Stucchi, M., y Carpio, M. (2019). Navegar por los aires: Análisis físico y biológico del siste- ma propuesto por Santiago de Cárdenas en el siglo XVIII (1a edición). Universidad del Pacífico, Fondo Editorial: AICB.