Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Iuris Dictio

Evaluation sheet

In this section, you will find the review form that peer reviewers must complete when an article is assigned to them.

We are posting this form so that both reviewers and authors can view it in advance. This form evaluates the academic quality of the submitted article and ensures the transparency of its content.

TITLE OF THE ARTICLE YOU ARE EVALUATING:

On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 is insufficient and 5 is excellent, evaluate the following aspects:

  1. TITLE AND ABSTRACT

Please choose one of the following options, considering whether the title clearly and accurately reflects the content of the article, and whether the abstract adequately presents the objective, methodology, main findings, and conclusions of the work.

  1. Insufficient
  2. Inadequate
  3. Average
  4. Good
  5. Excellent

If you have any comments on the title and accuracy of the abstract, please include them below.

  1. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

Please select one of the following options, considering whether the research problem is formulated clearly, is relevant, and is consistent with the development of the article.

  1. Insufficient
  2. Inadequate
  3. Average
  4. Good
  5. Excellent

If you have any comments on the problem statement, please include them below:

  1. ORGANIZATION OF THE ARTICLE

Please select one of the following options, taking into account whether the article has a clear, orderly, and coherent structure that facilitates understanding of its arguments and content.

  1. Insufficient
  2. Inadequate
  3. Average
  4. Good
  5. Excellent

If you have any comments on the organization of the article, please include them below:

  1. RELEVANCE OF THE TOPIC AND CURRENCY OF SOURCES

Please select one of the following options, considering the relevance of the topic addressed and the currency, adequacy, and relevance of the sources used.

  1. Insufficient
  2. Inadequate
  3. Average
  4. Good
  5. Excellent

If you have any comments on the relevance of the topic and the currency of the sources (bibliographic references, court rulings, etc.), please include them below.

  1. PRESENTATION, WRITING, AND STYLE

Please select one of the following options, taking into account the clarity of the text, the quality of the writing, and the appropriateness of the academic style used.

  1. Insufficient
  2. Inadequate
  3. Average
  4. Good
  5. Excellent

If you have any comments on the presentation, writing, and style, please include them below:

  1. CHANGES REQUIRED FOR PUBLICATION
  2. GENERAL COMMENTS
  3. FINAL RECOMMENDATION
  • Publishable
  • Not publishable
  • Publishable with changes