Diverse relations, multiple realities: re-building the relation with nature through a relational lense

Main Article Content

Fernando José Delgado Guerrero
María Gracia Cobo Encalada

Abstract

Beyond a doubt, discussions about the environment are on the rise. However, the analysis and the actions proposed to take care of the planet have usually been carried out with an anthropocentric purpose. As a consequence, the behavior patterns that led us to the current environmental situation continue to be repeated. Therefore, the following article questions this approach and proposes an alternative way of analyzing natural phenomena. It emphasizes that in order to rethink global ecological policies it is necessary to recognize the different ontological bases that expand the way of understanding the world. Thus, the article has as its starting point an overview of the current situation of environmental movements, followed by an introduction to the ontological field using a relational lens. In addition, a brief vision of Andean Philosophy and its relation with nature is presented as an example.

Keywords:
Ontology, anthropocentrism, relational approach, global politics, nature, Andean Philosophy, international relations,

Article Details

How to Cite
Delgado Guerrero, F. J., & Cobo Encalada , M. G. (2022). Diverse relations, multiple realities: re-building the relation with nature through a relational lense. El Outsider, 7, 31–45. https://doi.org/10.18272/eo.v7i.2461

References

Bourdeau, Ph. 2004. “The man-nature relationship and environmental ethics.” Journal of Environmental Radioactivity: 9-15.

Escobar, Arturo. 2014. Sentipensar con la tierra. Nuevas lecturas sobre desarrollo, territorio y diferencia. Medellín: UNAULA. http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/Colombia/escpos-unaula/20170802050253/pdf_460.pdf

—. (2015). “Transiciones: a space for research and design for transitions to the pluriverse.” Design Philosophy Papers 13(1): 13-23.

Inoue, Cristina y Matias Franchini. 2020. “Socio-environmentalism.” En Arlene Tickner y Karen Smith (eds.), International Relations from the Global South. Londres y Nueva York: Routledge. 296-314.

Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. 2016. The conduct of inquiry in international relations: Philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics. Routledge.

Lugo-Morín, Diosey Ramón, Larry M. Frolich y Teresa Magal-Royo. 2015. “Relación Ser Humano-Naturaleza: Debatiendo el desarrollo sostenible desde la filosofía de la ciencia.” European Scientific Journal: 1-12.

Ling, L. H. M. y Carolina Pinheiro. 2020. “South–South talk.” En Arlene Tickner y Karen Smith (eds.), International Relations from the Global South. Londres y Nueva York: Routledge, 317-40. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315756233-17.

Miranda, Camila. 2020. “Perspectivas desde el ecofeminismo frente al cambio climático y la Amazonía”. El Outsider 5: 17-29. https://revistas.usfq.edu.ec/index.php/eloutsider

Orellana, Kinti. 2020. “¿Integración De Quién Y Para Qué? Desmitificando La ‘Falta’ De Integración Latinoamericana”. Revista De La Facultad De Ciencias Jurídicas 2 (2): 6-12.

Orellana, Pablo. 2016. “Limitaciones De La(S) Teoría(S) De Relaciones Internacionales A Través De Un Prisma Filosófico Andino”. Universidad Verdad 71 (1): 73-91.

Rodríguez Lombardo, Mir. 2018. “Contra el Antropocentrismo: Entrevista con Vandana Shiva.” Revista de la Universidad de México: 38-46. https://www.revistadelauniversidad.mx/articles/adb0e75d-2bee-4f68-8a73-17fb1492c974/contra-el-antropocentrismo

Scauso, Marcos S., Garrett FitzGerald, Arlene B. Tickner, Navnita Chadha Behera, Chengxin Pan, Chih-yu Shih, y Kosuke Shimizu. 2020. “COVID-19, Democracies, and (De) Colonialities.” Democratic Theory 7 (29: 82-93.

Shiva, Vandana. 1988. “Women in Nature.” En Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Survival in India, 37-52. Londres: Zed Books Ltd.

Trownsell, Tamara Ann. 2013. Robust Relationality: Lessons from the Ontology of Complete Interconnectedness for the Field of International Relations. American University.

Trownsell, Tamara, Amaya Querejazu Escobari, Giorgio Shani, Navnita Chadha Behera, Jarrad Reddekop, y Arlene B. Tickner. 2019. “Recrafting International Relations through Relationality.” E-International Relations. Recuperado el 15 de diciembre, 2020. https://www.e-ir.info/2019/01/08/recrafting-international-relations-through-relationality/

Trownsell, Tamara, y Arlene. B Tickner. 2020. “Differing about Difference: An Introduction.” International Studies Perspectives: 1-40.

Vallejo, Ivette, y Didier Sánchez. 2011. “Del antropocentrismo y el naturalismo a otras racionalidades y ontologías.” Letras Verdes (Flacso Ecuador ): 29-31.