The gray area between the relativity of contracts and the inclusion of non-signatory third parties in arbitration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18272/lr.v1i2.872Keywords:
Arbitration, arbitration agreement, contractual relativity, non-signatory third parties, implicit consent, own acts, res inter alios actaAbstract
This paper aims to analyze whether the theories of extension of the effects of the arbitration clause to non-signatory third parties are opposite to the principle of contractual relativity. In order to reach an answer, a number of jurisprudence decisions have been analyzed in which it has been determined that it is possible to include a non-signatory third party to the arbitration process based on an implicit consent. In this way, I will try to prove that, based on the previous mentioned conducts, during and after the celebration of the arbitration agreement, arbitration can be accepted, even by a party that did not sign it, and also not causing a collision with the principle res inter alios acta. .
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
In relation to copy rights, authors publishing with USFQ Law Review know and accept its internal policies, including but not limited to:
1. Open Access Policy.
2. Authorship Policy.
3. Copyright Policy.
4. Pre-Publication Policy.
5. Post-Publication Policy.
6. Intellectual Property Protection Policy.
7. Digital Preservation Policy.