The gray area between the relativity of contracts and the inclusion of non-signatory third parties in arbitration

Authors

  • Adriana Orellana Ubidia Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ (Quito, Ecuador)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18272/lr.v1i2.872

Keywords:

Arbitration, arbitration agreement, contractual relativity, non-signatory third parties, implicit consent, own acts, res inter alios acta

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze whether the theories of extension of the effects of the arbitration clause to non-signatory third parties are opposite to the principle of contractual relativity. In order to reach an answer, a number of jurisprudence decisions have been analyzed in which it has been determined that it is possible to include a non-signatory third party to the arbitration process based on an implicit consent. In this way, I will try to prove that, based on the previous mentioned conducts, during and after the celebration of the arbitration agreement, arbitration can be accepted, even by a party that did not sign it, and also not causing a collision with the principle res inter alios acta. .

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Adriana Orellana Ubidia, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ (Quito, Ecuador)

Universidad San Francisco de Quito, estudiante del Colegio de Jurisprudencia, Campus Cumbayá, Casilla Postal 17-1200-841, Quito 170901, Ecuador.

Published

2014-05-01

How to Cite

Orellana Ubidia, Adriana. “The Gray Area Between the Relativity of Contracts and the Inclusion of Non-Signatory Third Parties in Arbitration”. USFQ Law Review, vol. 1, no. 2, May 2014, pp. 27-37, doi:10.18272/lr.v1i2.872.

Issue

Section

Papers