The gray area between the relativity of contracts and the inclusion of non-signatory third parties in arbitration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18272/lr.v1i2.872Keywords:
Arbitration, arbitration agreement, contractual relativity, non-signatory third parties, implicit consent, own acts, res inter alios actaAbstract
This paper aims to analyze whether the theories of extension of the effects of the arbitration clause to non-signatory third parties are opposite to the principle of contractual relativity. In order to reach an answer, a number of jurisprudence decisions have been analyzed in which it has been determined that it is possible to include a non-signatory third party to the arbitration process based on an implicit consent. In this way, I will try to prove that, based on the previous mentioned conducts, during and after the celebration of the arbitration agreement, arbitration can be accepted, even by a party that did not sign it, and also not causing a collision with the principle res inter alios acta. .
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
In relation to copy rights, authors publishing with USFQ Law Review know and accept its internal policies, including but not limited to:
1. Open Access Policy.
2. Authorship Policy.
3. Copyright Policy.
4. Pre-Publication Policy.
5. Post-Publication Policy.
6. Intellectual Property Protection Policy.
7. Digital Preservation Policy.
