Dispute boards in Latin America: resolution of infrastructure disputes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18272/ulr.v10i2.3023Keywords:
dispute resolution, infrastructure projects, Alternative methods of dispute solution, dispute boards, Latin AmericaAbstract
Infrastructure projects are essential for the development of societies, as they have a direct impact on access to several basic rights. Construction is a key industry for the implementation of these projects, but its complexity often generates disagreements among main actors, which can result in high levels of litigation and costs in time and money. For this, alternative dispute resolution methods have gained momentum in the region. Among them, dispute resolution boards have stood out as a successful alternative. However, their implementation in Latin America has been slow and there are challenges that must be addressed to improve their effectiveness.
This article examines the characteristics of these alternative mechanisms and highlights their benefits in managing conflicts in infrastructure projects. The critical factors and challenges for their implementation in the region are also analyzed. Lastly, this research presents some best practices for the application of these instruments, which are a promising alternative for the efficient resolution of disputes in infrastructure projects in Latin America. However, proper execution of these contractual tools requires greater commitment from key actors —such as regulatory agencies— to implement them and improve their effectiveness.
Downloads
References
Bates, Albert Jr., y R. Zachary Torres-Fowler. “Dispute Boards: A Different Approach to Dispute Resolution”. En The Comparative Law Yearbook of International Business, editado por Christian Campbell, 237-64. Países Bajos: Kluwer Law International, 2020.
Annual Casework Report. London Court of International Arbitration. 2021.
Artículo 16. Reglamento de la CCI Relativo a los Dispute Boards. Cámara de Comercio Internacional (CCI). 1 de octubre de 2015.
Bunni, Nael G. “Dispute Boards-Do’s and Dont’s”. Construction Law International 1, n.o 3 (2006): 10-4.
Burgos Herrera, Mónica Paola, y José David Lemus Gutiérrez. “Implementación de los dispute boards en los contratos de infraestructura vial”. Tesis, Universidad Externado de Colombia, 2019. https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/server/api/core/bitstreams/f932079a-c41e-4c59-aade-2a1f715684e1/content.
Caso Blake Construction c. CJ Coakley, District of Columbia Court of Appeals, Juez Kern, 27 de mayo de 1981.
Cassagne, Juan Carlos, y Eduardo García de Enterría. El principio de legalidad y el control judicial de la discrecionalidad administrativa. Madrid: Marcial Pons, 2009.
Castro-Jiménez, Verónica. “Generalidades de los mecanismos alternativos de solución de controversias”. Revista de Investigaciones: Universidad del Quindío 33, n.o 2. (Julio 2021): 213-18. https://doi.org/10.33975/riuq.vol33nS2.453.
Chan, Albert, David Scott, y Edmond Lam. “Framework of success criteria for design/build projects”. Journal of Management in Engineering 18, n.o 3 18, n.o 3. (Junio 2002): 120-8. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2002)18:3(120).
Chapman, Peter. “Dispute boards on major infrastructure projects”. Management, Procurement and Law 162, n.o 1. (Mayo 2009): 7-16. https://doi.org/10.1680/mpal.2009.162.1.7.
Charrett, Donald. The application of contracts in engineering and construction projects. Londres: Informa Law from Routledge, 2018.
Chern, Cyril. Chern on dispute boards. Londres: CRC Press, 2015.
Cheung, Sai-On, Henry Suen, y Tsun-Ip Lam. “Fundamentals of alternative dispute resolution processes in construction”. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 128, n.o 5. (Octubre 2002): 409-17. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:5(409)2002).
Contrato de Concesión 001, 2010, p. 107.
Contrato de Concesión 002, 2010.
Contrato de Concesión 007, 2010.
Cuentas Pino, Daniel, e Irene Nuviala Lapieza. “El alma, corazón y vida de los dispute boards: reflexiones acerca de su regulación en Latinoamérica y el Perú”. Advocatus, n.o 35. (Marzo 2022): 225-39. https://doi.org/10.26439/advocatus2022.n042.5755.
Proaño, David, y Marco Guevara. “Las virtudes de los dispute boards y su aplicación en Ecuador”. USFQ Law Review 6, n.o 1. (Septiembre 2019). https://doi.org/10.18272/lr.v6i1.1372.
De Ly, Filip, y Paul-A. Gélinas. Dispute Prevention and Settlement Through Expert Determination and Dispute Boards. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2016.
Dispute Resolution Statistics. International Chamber of Commerce. 2020.
Drahozal, Christopher R. “Arbitration costs and forum accessibility: empirical evidence.” University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 41, n.o 4. (2008): 813-41. https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol41/iss4/3.
El-Sewafy, Tarek S., Ahmed F. Waly, y Ola D. El-Monayeri. “Framework for the successful implementation of dispute boards in construction projects”. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction 14, n.o 1. (Diciembre 2022). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000520.
Enterría Martínez-Carande, Eduardo García. “La lucha contra las inmunidades del poder en el derecho administrativo (poderes discrecionales, poderes de gobierno, poderes normativos).” Revista de administración pública 38. (1962).
Entwisle, David. “Dispute boards in context”. Tesis, Robert Gordon University, 2010.
Estache, Antonio, Vivien Foster, y Quentin Wodon. Cómo considerar la pobreza en las reformas de infraestructura : lecciones de la experiencia en América Latina. Bogotá: Banco Mundial, 2004.
Fawzy, Salwa A., et al. “Civil law context for understanding employer’s payment obligations under common law FIDIC”. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction 11, n.o 1 (2019): 06518006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000285.
Figueroa, Dante. “Dispute boards for infrastructure projects in Latin America: a new kid on the block”. Dispute Resolution International 11, n.o 2. (Octubre 2017): 151-74. https://fidic.org/content/dispute-boards-infrastructure-projects-latin-america-new-kid-block.
Figueroa Valdés, Juan Eduardo. “Dispute boards: la visión de las partes y su co-existencia con los contratos administrativos. Experiencias en Chile”, en Dispute Boards en Latinoamérica: Experiencias y retos, coordinado por Roberto Hernández García (Madrid: Bosch, 2014).
Figueroa Valdés, Juan Eduardo. “Los dispute boards o paneles técnicos en los contratos internacionales de construcción”. Gaceta Jurídica 364. (Octubre 2010): 9-17.
Fitriyanti, Fadia, y Emil Adly. “Lessons learned in the use of dispute boards to the settlement of construction service disputes”. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction 14, n.o 1. (Octubre 2022): 04521041. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000508.
Freyre, Mario Castillo, y Rita Sabroso Minaya. “Arbitraje obligatorio y de derecho en la contratación pública”. Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial 5, n.o 5. (Diciembre 2009): 237-52. https://doi.org/10.35292/ropj.v5i5.220.
Gherghina, Oana Ruxandra. “Comparative study between FIDIC Dispute Adjudication and Negotiation as Alternative Dispute Resolution methods.” Conferința Internațională de Drept, Studii Europene și Relații Internaționale V (2017): 252-60. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=825057.
Gidwani, Karen. “Alternatives to the dispute Board-Project mediation”. The FIDIC Contracts Conference 2007 (5 de octubre de 2007). https://www.fenwick-elliott.co.uk/file/41/download?token=oi60wJ-Y
Gould, Nicholas, y Robbie McCrea. “Trends, observations, developments and procedures.” En Construction Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution: Theory and Practice Around the World, editado por Renato Nazzini. Nueva York: Routledge, 2021.
Gould, Nicholas. “Establishing dispute boards–Selecting, nominating and appointing board members.” Society of Construction International Conference in Singapore, vol. 16. (Singapur, diciembre 2006).
Grove, Jesse B., y Richard Appuhn. “Comparative Experience with Dispute Boards in the United States and Abroad Alternative Dispute Resolution.” Construction Lawyer 32, n.o 3 (2012): 6-16.
Hardjomuljadi, Sarwono. “Use of dispute avoidance and adjudication boards”. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction 12, n.o 4 (2020): 03720004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000431.
Harmon, Kathleen. “Resolution of construction disputes: a review of current methodologies”. Leadership and Management in Engineering 3, n.o 4. (Octubre 2003): 187-201. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2003)3:4(187).
Hernández González, Francisco Lorenzo. “La problemática del restablecimiento del equilibrio económico en la contratación pública internacional: la crisis de la ampliación del Canal de Panamá.” Revista de Administración Pública 194. (Mayo 2014): 475-508. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4792842.
Houghton, Anthony. “Should dispute boards (also) be made mandatory?”. Asian Dispute Review 16, n.o 4. (Diciembre 2014): 196-201. https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Asian+Dispute+Review/16.4/ADR2014047.
Irene Nuviala Lapieza. “Los dispute boards como mecanismo de resolución de conflictos en los contratos internacionales de ingeniería y construcción: un análisis desde la perspectiva del derecho transnacional”. Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Zaragoza, 2021. https://zaguan.unizar.es/record/106186/files/TESIS-2021-158.pdf.
Jaeger, Axel-Volkmar, y Götz-Sebastian Hök. FIDIC: A guide for practitioners. Heidelberg: Springer, 2010.
Klee, Lukas, y Daniel Novy. “Construction dispute boards”. Czech & Central European Yearbook of Arbitration 4. (Marzo 2014): 171-83. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2404839.
Koch, Christopher. “ICC’s new dispute board rules”. ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin 15, n.o 4. (Otoño 2004): 10-34. http://www.landoltandkoch.com/medias/icc-db-rules-iccbul-15-2-04-off-print-english.pdf.
Kumaraswamy, Mohan M. “Conflicts, claims and disputes in construction”. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management 4, n.o 2. (Febrero 1997): 95-111. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1365232x.
Lane, Patrick, y Michael Watson. “Effectiveness of dispute adjudication boards, South Africa”. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Management, Procurement and Law 163, n.o 4. (Noviembre 2010): 171-7. https://doi.org/10.1680/mpal.2010.163.4.171.
García , Laura. “Mediación o conciliación: una decisión de política judicial.” Revista Fronesis 20, n.o 1. (Enero 2013): 104-18.
Lee, Chia Kuang, Tak Wing Yiu, y Sai On Cheung. “Selection and use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in construction projects-past and future research”. International Journal of Project Management 34, n.o 3. (Abril 2016): 494-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.12.008.
Mattli, Walter. “Private justice in a global economy: from litigation to arbitration”. International Organization 55, n.o 4. (Julio 2001): 919-47. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081801317193646.
McDermott, Peter, Malik Khalfan, y Will Swan. “Trust in construction projects”. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction 10, n.o 1. (Marzo 2005): 19-31. http://alliancecontractingelectroniclawjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/McDermott-P.-Khalfan-M.-and-Swan-W.-2005-%E2%80%98Trust-in-Construction-Projects%E2%80%99.pdf.
Moza, Amit, y Virendra Kumar Paul. “Review of the effectiveness of arbitration”. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction 9, n.o 1. (Julio 2017): 03716002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000204.
Ndekugri, Issaka, et al. “Best practice in the training, appointment, and remuneration of members of dispute boards for large infrastructure projects”. Journal of Management in Engineering 30, n.o 2. (Marzo 2014): 185-93. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000195.
Ogu-Jude, Munachiso. “Are dispute boards the future of dispute resolution in the international construction industry?”. Transnational Litigation/Arbitration, Private International Law, & Conflict of Laws ejournal 7, n.o 32. (Julio 2020). https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3630343.
Omoto, Toshihiko. “Dispute boards, resolution and avoidance of disputes in construction contracts”. En Proceeding of TC302 Symposium Osaka 2011: International Symposium on Backwards Problem in Geotechnical Engineering and Monitoring of Geo-Construction. Julio 2011.
Oñate, Tatiana, y Francisco Ternera Barrios. “El contrato sui generis de amigable composición: una alternativa para la solución de controversias en los proyectos de infraestructura”. Derecho Público n.o 35. (Julio 2015): 3-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.15425/redepub.35.2015.03.
Ong, Brennan, y Paula Gerber. “Dispute boards: is there a role for lawyers.” Construction Law International 5, n.o 4. (2010): 7-12. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1932553.
Owen, Gwyn, y Brian Totterdill. Dispute boards: procedure and practice. Londres: ICE Publishing, 2007.
Paredes, Gustavo. “Dispute boards y arbitraje en construcción: ¿compiten o se complementan?”. En Dispute boards en Latinoamérica: Experiencias y retos, coordinado por Roberto Hernández García, 79-85. Lima: Estudio Mario Castillo Freyre, 2013.
Paredes, Gustavo. “Jugando a las vencidas: Dispute boards vs. árbitro de emergencia”. Derecho & Sociedad, n.o 55 (octubre 2020): 255-64. https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/23246.
Podetti, Humberto. El contrato de construcción. Buenos Aires: Astrea 2004.
Pereira Ribeiro, Marcia Carla, y Caroline Sampaio de Almeida. “Análise crítica das cláusulas dispute board: eficiência e casos práticos.” Novos estudos jurídicos 18, n.o 2. (Agosto 2013): 224-39. https://doi.org/10.14210/nej.v18n2.p224-239.
Rojas-López, Miguel David, Mariana Henao-Grajales, y María Elena Valencia-Corrales. “Lean construction LC bajo pensamiento Lean.” Revista Ingenierías: Universidad de Medellín 16, n.o 30. (Enero 2017): 115-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.22395/rium.v16n30a6.
Rosenberg, Benjamin D., y Jason T. Siegel. “A 50-year review of psychological reactance theory: do not read this article.” Motivation Science 4, n.o 4. (Diciembre 2018): 281-300. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000091.
Royo-Villanova, Segismundo. “La responsabilidad de la administración pública”. Revista de Administración Pública 19. (1956): 11-58.
Schwartz, Jordan, Luis Andres, y Georgeta Dragoiu. “Crisis in Latin America: infrastructure investment, employment and the expectations of stimulus”. Journal of Infrastructure Development 1, n.o 2. (Julio 2009): 111-31. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5009.
Sedgwick, Philip, y Nan Greenwood. “Understanding the Hawthorne effect”. BMJ 351. (Septiembre 2015): h4672. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h4672.
Shnookal, Toby, y Donald Charrett. “Standard form contracting; the role for FIDIC contracts domestically and internationally.. En Society of Construction Law Australia Conference (2010), https://mtecc.com.au/standard-form-contracting-the-role-for-fidic-contracts-domestically-and-internationally.
Sipán Velásquez, Miguel Ángel. “La eficacia de la Junta de Resolución de Disputas en el Sistema de Solución de Conflictos de las Contrataciones del Estado”. Tesis de grado, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2018.
Stipanowich, Thomas J., y Véronique Fraser. “The international task force on mixed mode dispute resolution: exploring the interplay between mediation, evaluation and arbitration in commercial cases”. Fordham International Law Journal 40, n.o 3. (2017): 839.
Sturup, Sophie, y Nicholas Low. “Sustainable development and mega infrastructure: an overview of the issues.” Journal of Mega Infrastructure & Sustainable Development 1, n.o 1. (Julio 2019): 8-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/24724718.2019.1591744.
Sun, Ming, y Xianhai Meng. “Taxonomy for change causes and effects in construction projects”. International Journal of Project Management 27, n.o 6. (Agosto 2009): 560-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.10.005.
Thi Hoa, Nguyen, y Tran Hoang Tu Linh. “Alternative dispute resolution and the application of the multitiered dispute resolution clause in the international construction sector.” Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction 15, n.o 1. (Noviembre 2022): 04522049. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4382698.
Van Langelaar, Anton. “Dispute boards-an introduction.” Civil Engineering 22, n.o 7 (2014): 72-3. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC157377.
Van Langelaar, Anton. “Dispute boards-dispute avoidance role, part 1.” Civil Engineering 23, n.o 1. (Enero 2015): 69-74. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC166166.
Van Langelaar, Anton. “Dispute boards-the new FIDIC second edition 2017 DB provisions”. Civil Engineering, n.o 1. (Enero-febrero 2018): 20-7.
Vaz, Gilberto José, and Pedro Augusto Gravatá. “Los Dispute Boards y Los Contratos Administrativos: ¿Son Los DB’s Una Buena Solución Para Disputas Sujetas a Normas de Orden Público?” En Dispute Boards En Latinoamérica: Experiencias y Retos, 99–121. Lima: Estudio Mario Castillo Freyre, 2014.
Wiezel, James P. “Cost-effective construction arbitration.” The Construction Lawyer 31, n.o 2. (Primavera 2011): 15-22. https://www.international-arbitration-attorney.com/wp-content/uploads/arbitrationlawCost_effective_Construction_Arbitration_By_James_Wiezel_Construction_LawyerSpring2011.pdf.
Wood, Philip R. Project finance, securitisations, subordinated debt. Londres: Sweet & Maxwell, 2007.
Zack, James. “Practical dispute management”. Cost Engineering 37, n.o 12. (Diciembre 1995): 55.
Zambrano, Maria Yokir Reyna. “El control a la gestión en la administración pública: una mirada a las legislaciones de Ecuador y Perú”. Revista San Gregorio 19. (Diciembre, 2017): 154-167. https://doi.org/10.36097/rsan.v4i19.537.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Juan Pablo Gómez Moreno
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
In relation to copy rights, authors publishing with USFQ Law Review know and accept its internal policies, including but not limited to:
1. Open Access Policy.
2. Authorship Policy.
3. Copyright Policy.
4. Pre-Publication Policy.
5. Post-Publication Policy.
6. Intellectual Property Protection Policy.
7. Digital Preservation Policy.
