Contemporary Company Law Solutions: Aspects not Provided for the Traditional Type of Companies

Authors

  • Martin Urbano USFQ

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18272/ulr.v9i1.2268

Keywords:

Analogy, mandatory laws, default provisions, ; liability, directors, policy failure, company

Abstract

This paperwork presents an analysis about the implications of the new legal forms provided by the  Simplified Shares Company regulations  and the reform to the Company Law, as it is considered that they have brought to our legislation  new legal forms that regulate aspects which are not provided for the traditional companies. Consequently, within this article, it is proposed, as a first instance, that the mandatory regime coexists along the default rules regime, letting us clarify the impacts of not recognising legal forms such as:  abuse of participation rights, de facto and shadow directors, unanimous approval to include an arbitration clause, and mediation as a mechanism provided to solve corporate conflicts. Along the same lines, owing to the lack of explicit recognition of these legal forms, within this paperwork, some solutions are provided to deal with conflicts associated with the new legal forms in the traditional companies. Those solutions are essentially based on the redirection of rules provided in our Company Law which, mainly, redirect us to apply the Civil Code norms.

Finally, within this paperwork, it is proposed that, even though, we can find many solutions for the lack of recognition of new legal forms, our Company Law must be reformed, so it can provide standardised regulations to deal with the new figures included in our Company Law, since it is required to have efficient regulations that are able to respond to the modern commercial needs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Código Civil [CC]. R.O. Suplemento 46 de 08 de julio de 2019.

Código de Comercio [CCo]. R.O. Suplemento 497 de 10 de diciembre de 2020.

Código Orgánico General de Procesos. [COGEP] 26 de junio de 2019. RO.506.

Constitución de la República del Ecuador [CRE]. R.O. 449, 20 de octubre de 2008, reformada por última vez R.O. Suplemento 377 de 25 de enero de 2021.

García, Galo. "Arbitraje estatutario : antecedentes, alcance y aplicación en el Ecuador." Universidad Católica Santiago de Guayaquil, (Febrero 2019): 17, http://repositorio.ucsg.edu.ec/handle/3317/13106.

Hydrodam (Corby) Ltd (in Liquidation), High Court 115 of England and Wales, Chancery Division, 17 December 1994.

Larrea Holguín, Juan. "Parte General y Personas." En Derecho Civil Ecuador, 225-226. Quito: Corporación de Estudios y Publicaciones, 2009.

Ley de Arbitraje y Mediación [LAM]. R.O. 417 de 21 de agosto de 2018.

Ley de Compañías. [LC]. R.O. 312 de 10 de diciembre de 2020.

Ley de Modernización a la Ley de Compañías. R.O. 347 de 10 de diciembre de 2020.

Ley Orgánica de Emprendimiento e Innovación. R.O. 151 de 28 de Febrero de 2020.

McCahery, Joseph, Erik Vermeulen, Masato Hisatake, y Jun Saito. "The New Company Law -What Matters in an Innovative Economy." ECGI, Law Working Paper No. 75. (September 2006): 4-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.942993

Mumtaz Properties Ltd RE (2011) EWCA Civ 610, Wetton v Ahmed, UK Supreme Court of Appeal, 24 May 2011.

Noboa, Paúl. y Esteban Ortiz. "La Autonomía de la Voluntad como Eje del Sistema en las Sociedades por Acciones Simplificadas del Ecuador." (Mayo 2020): 3-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3599295.

Noboa, Paúl. y Esteban Ortiz. "Personalidad Jurídica Independiente de la Sociedad por Acciones Simplificada y Responsabilidad de sus Accionistas. Revista Ruptura AED PUCE, Edición 2020 (Junio 2020): 589-620. https://doi.org/10.26807/rr.vi02.35.

Parraguez, Luis. "Ineficacia del contrato," en Régimen Jurídico del Contrato. Quito: Editorial Cevallos, 2014.

Raz, J. (1985). The authority of law Essays on Law and Morality [La autoridad del Derecho. Ensayos sobre Derecho y Moral]. (R. Tamayo, Trad.). Imprenta Universitaria. (Trabajo original publicado en 1979).

Reyes Villamizar, F. (2009). La sociedad por acciones simplificada: Una verdadera innovación en el Derecho Societario latinoamericano.[Archivo PDF]. http://scm.oas.org/pdfs/2016/CP36957T.pdf

Reyes Villamizar, Francisco. Aspectos Generales de la Sociedad por Acciones Simplificadas en Derecho Societario. Bogotá: Editorial Temis, 2020.

Reyes Villamizar, Francisco. La Sociedad por Acciones Simplificada, ed. 4. Bogotá: Legis Editores, 2020.

Saux Edgardo y Enrique Müller. Responsabilidad Civil Aquiliana. Santa Fe: Universidad de litoral, 2005.

Trazegnies Granda, Fernando. La Responsabilidad Extracontractual. Lima: Editorial Ara Editores, 2016.

Published

2022-07-13

How to Cite

Urbano, Martin. “Contemporary Company Law Solutions: Aspects Not Provided for the Traditional Type of Companies”. USFQ Law Review, vol. 9, no. 1, July 2022, pp. 17-35, doi:10.18272/ulr.v9i1.2268.

Issue

Section

Papers