Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Iuris Dictio

Monográfica

Núm. 22 (2018)

The manifestation of consent in conditions of economic violence: a pending matter in arbitration

DOI
https://doi.org/10.18272/iu.v22i22.1145
Submitted
June 16, 2018
Published
2018-12-13

Abstract

Despite the fact that the Arbitration building has been consolidated on the foundations of the unequivocal expression of consent, for years the institution of Arbitration has been subject to a regime that has not been able to establish the differential line between contract and arbitration consent, to such an extent that both terms are taken as synonyms in most studies on the matter. Hence, the observations and analyzes made on issues related to the aptitude and material validity of consent in Arbitration are scarce, confusing, and problematic.

For such considerations, the present academic essay aims to propose a rereading of the feld of action of the arbitration consent, in order to purge it of the semantic faults inherited by the Arbitration Doctrine, highly influenced by the General Theory of Obligations. Finally it aims to highlight in an exclusive way the material product of the interrelation between violence, economy, and arbitration consensus, together with its jurisdictional consequences.

viewed = 777 times

References

  1. Aguilar Carbajal, L. (1977) Contratos Civiles. Editorial Porrúa S.A.: Mexico D.F.
  2. Bullard, A. (2015). Cuando todos se equivocan. El nuevo amparo contra actos de ejecución del laudo arbitral. Revista Actualidad Jurídica. Vol. 1.
  3. Cabrillac, R. (2007). La Violencia Económica: panorama de Derecho Comparado. Revista Ius et veritas. No. 53.
  4. Caivano, R. (2015) El contrato de arbitraje y su autonomía respecto del contrato que lo contiene.Derecho y Ciencias Sociales. No. 13.
  5. Davis, K. (1999) A model for arbitration law: Autonomy, cooperation and curtailment of State power. The Fordham Urban Law Journal. Vol. 26.
  6. Delaume, G. (1988) Law and practice of transnational contracts. Oceana Review.
  7. González de Cossio, F. (2007) La nueva forma del acuerdo arbitral. Aún otra victoria del consensualismo. Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado. No. 120.
  8. Grigera Naón, H. (1989) La autonomía del acuerdo arbitral. Revista La Ley. No. 1107.
  9. Hinestrosa, F. (2005) Estado de Necesidad y estado de peligro. Revista de Derecho Privado. No. 8.
  10. Redfern, Alan & Hunter, M. (2004) Law and practice of international commercial arbitration. Sweet & Maxwell . Vol. 4th.
  11. Reuben, R. (1997) Public Justice: Toward a state action theory of Alternative Dispute Resolution. California Law Review. No. 85.
  12. Scognamiglio, R. (1972). Contratti in generale. Milano: A. Vallardi.
  13. Searle, J. (1994). Actos de habla. Barcelona: Editorial Planeta-Agostini.
  14. Solé, J. (2016). La intimidación o amenaza como vicio del consentimiento contractual: textos, principios europeos y propuestas de reforma en España. InDret Revista para el análisis del Derecho, 4/18, 1-32.
  15. Xin, Y. (2016). Las teorías de los actos de habla. Oviedo: Centro Internacional de Postgrado de la Universidad Oviedo.
  16. Legislación:
  17. Código Civil Brasil. Decreto Ofcial N° 10406, 10 de enero de 2002.
  18. Código Civil Italiano. Decreto Ofcial N° 262, 16 de Marzo de 1942.

Most read articles by the same author(s)