Congressional-seats distribution in Ecuador and its importance on democracy
Main Article Content
Abstract
Ecuador is a democratic State which promotes citizen participation in the decision-making process that is materialized through universal and direct suffrage. For this reason, every four years Ecuadorians cast their ballots entrusting their representation and political responsibility of the country to political parties. Several mathematicians have proposed alternatives to allocate congressional-seats under a principle of proportionality. The Código de la Democracia published in 2009, established Webster and D’Hondt as the allocation methods. These are important to the extent that depending on the formula that is applied significantly alters the control of the parliament. This research proposes to bring the reader closer to the impact that the application of the Webster method will have on the composition of the legislature in the following elections through the comparison and conversion of the results obtained in 2017 with the D’Hondt method with respect to the method that will be applied from 2021.
Article Details
References
Ackerman, John M. 2018. “Estalinismo Electoral.” Proceso 52.
Ayala Mora, Enrique. 2018. Evolución Constitucional del Ecuador: Rasgos históricos. Quito: Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar / Corporación Editora Nacional.
Bobbio, Norberto. 1976. La teoría de las formas de gobierno en la historia del pensamiento político. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Código de la Democracia. 2009. Ecuador: Asamblea Nacional.
Consejo Nacional Electoral. 2017. Resultados Electorales. Instituto de la Democracia.
Estrella Aguilar, Rafael. 2018. Webster vs D’Hondt. El principio constitucional de proporcionalidad. Cuenca: Universidad de Cuenca.
Guastini, Riccardo. 2017. La sintaxis del derecho. Madrid: Marcial Pons.
Ley de Elecciones. 2000. Ecuador: Congreso Nacional.
Maldonado, Mauricio. 2019. La democracia a partir de Bobbio. Quito: Cevallos.
Mill, John Stuart. 2001. Consideraciones sobre el gobierno representativo. Madrid: Alianza.
Montesquieu. 2002. El espíritu de las leyes. Madrid: Istmo.
Perfiles de opinión. 2020. Calificación a la gestión de la Asamblea Nacional. entrevista,Quito: P.O, 3.
Tribunal Constitucional. 2004. «Declaratoria de incostitucionalidad de los artículos 105 y 106.» Registro oficial No. 282.