The Narration of Female Role in the Independence Process within Historiography A Masculine Perspective
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Historiography has allowed to diminish the writing and narration of women’s works throughout Latin American independence to the point of distorting their true purpose. The implications of a poorly researched or censored social science include perpetuating negligent standards. Through them, the mass reproduction of gender roles and stereotypes is not only confined to a misogynistic past but also continues in an ill-informed present. Today there are evident ruptures amongst sisterhood and social protest is constantly delegitimized, partly caused by a historiography biased in favor of female prudence and rectitude, causing a disconnection between privileged women and intersectional feminism.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors, by publishing in this journal, accept the following terms:
- The authors will retain their copyrights and will guarantee the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Acknowledgement License that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication in this journal are indicated.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the published version of the work, thus being able to publish it in a monographic volume or reproduce it in other ways, provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work via the Internet:
- Before journal submission, authors can deposit the manuscript in preprint servers/repositories, including arXiv, bioRxiv, figshare, PeerJ Preprints, and SSRN, among others, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work (See The effect of open access).
- After submission, it is recommended that authors deposit their article in their institutional repository, personal web page, or scientific social network (such as Zenodo, ResearchGate o Academia.edu).
How to Cite
References
Beauvoir, Simone. 1949. El Segundo Sexo. París: Editions Gallimard.
Cantero Rosales, María Ángeles. 2007. “De ‘perfecta casada’ a ‘ángel del hogar’ o la construcción del arquetipo femenino en el XIX”. Tonos Digital [Online] 14:0. http://www.tonosdigital.es/ojs/index.php/tonos/article/view/142/116
Eraso, Judith. 2011. “Representaciones de las mujeres en la Independencia desde la historiografía colombiana”. HiSTOReLo. Revista de Historia Regional y Local 3(5): 169-190. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=345832078007
Fray Luis de León. (1583). La Perfecta Casada. Obra reproducida sin responsabilidad editorial, derechos de autor caducados.
Galeano, Eduardo. 2015. Mujeres. España: Siglo XXI Editores.
Hennes, Heather. 2005. The Spaces of a Free Spirit: Manuela Sáenz in Literature and Film. Florida: The Florida State University College of Arts and Science.
—. 2009. “Los ‘diarios perdidos’ de Manuela Sáenz y la formación de un ícono cultural”. Kipus: revista andina de letras 26: 109-132. ISSN: 1390-0102
Quintero, Inés. 2001. “Las mujeres de la Independencia: ¿heroínas o transgresoras? El caso de Manuela Sáenz”. Actas do XII Congresso Internacional de AHILA 3: 58-76.
Reverter, Sonia. 2011. Los retos del feminismo institucional- Revista Internacional de Filosofía 4: 223-229. ISSN: 1130-0507.
Semidober, Isabel. 2002. “Identidad femenina y rol ocupacional”. Orientación y Sociedad 3: 195-203.
Sneider, Allison L. 1994. “The Impact of Empire on the North American Woman Suffrage Movement: Suffrage Racism in an Imperial Context”. UCLA Historical Journal 14(0): 14-32. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4jk7j88j