Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Iuris Dictio

Dossier

Núm. 20 (2017)

The Inter-American Human Rights System and the (Real?) lack of regional support

  • Eduardo Bertoni
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18272/iu.v20i20.906
Submitted
June 14, 2017
Published
2017-12-18

Abstract

In 2008, Professor Gerald Neuman published an article that sparked debate not only on the relevance of the Inter-American Human Rights System (IHHR) but also on its legitimacy in the region. After nearly 10 years of publishing that article, this paper will review one of the pillars that enabled Professor Neuman to build upon his arguments and that many others had also mentioned: the very low compliance with the Court's decisions and their relationship to the notion of "effectiveness" or "legitimacy" of the Regional Court and its mechanism for interpreting the Convention. The work concludes with the need to explore as a mechanism for interpreting the treaty the search for a regional consensus on the scope and concept of the rights involved in decisions. viewed = 1269 times

References

  1. Basch, Fernando et al. (2010). La Efectividad del Sistema Interamericano de Protección de Derechos Humanos: Un Enfoque Cuantitativo sobre su Funcionamento y sobre el Cumplimento de sus Decisiones. Sur-Revista Internacional de Derechos Humanos, 7 (12), 9-35.
  2. Binder, C. (2012). fte Prohibition of Amnesties by the Inter- American Court of Human Rights. En Von Bogdandy A. and Venzke I. (eds.). International Judicial Lawmaking (pp. 295- 328). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
  3. Huneeus, A. (2011). Courts Resisting Courts: Lessons from the Inter-American Court"™s Struggle to Enforce Human Rights. Cornell International Law Journal, 44 (3), 493-533.
  4. Hurd, I. (1999). Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics. International Organization, 53, 379-408.
  5. Insulza, J M. (2006). Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos: presente y futuro. Anuario de Derechos Humanos 2006 (pp. 119-126).
  6. Neuman, S. (2008). Import, Export, and Regional Consent in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. The European Journal of International Law, 19 (1), 101-123.
  7. Rodriguez Garavito, C. y Kauffman, C (2015). Desafíos del Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos. Nuevos tiempos, viejos retos (pp. 276-317). Bogotá: Dejusticia.
  8. Yuval, S. (2014). Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  9. Comunicados de prensa:
  10. Corte Suprema Argentina (2017). La Corte sostuvo que la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos no puede revocar sentencias del Máximo Tribunal Argentino. 14 de febrero de 2017.

Most read articles by the same author(s)