A New Agenda for Research in International Trade and Intellectual Property Rights

Authors

  • Keith Maskus Universidad San Francisco de Quito

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18272/iu.v19i19.897

Keywords:

Patents, Trade policy, Productivity, Inequality

Abstract

Despite major global increases in the legal protection of intellectual property rights, the evidence of any increase in innovation remains inconclusive, though there has been a rise in technology transfers to emerging countries. Beyond these statements, economists know little about other potential impacts of stronger patents. This article sets out an agenda for additional research that economic and legal scholars should undertake to shed light on several important issues. Examples include policy complementarities between free trade agreements and IPRs, the channels through which stronger patents may affect productivity and trade, how IPRs interact with supply chains, and impacts of protection on inequality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Keith Maskus, Universidad San Francisco de Quito

Universidad San Francisco de Quito

References

Anderson, K., van der Mensbrugghe, D., and Martin, W. (2006). Market and Welfare Implications of Doha Reform Scenarios. In K. Anderson and W. Martin (eds.). Agricultural Trade Reform and the Doha Development Agenda (pp. 333-399). Washington: World Bank.

Antras, P. (2005). Incomplete Contracts and the Product Cycle. American Economic Review, 95, 1054-1073.

Autor, D. H., Dorn, D., and Hanson, G. H. (2013). The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States. American Economic Review, 103, 2121-2168.

Baldwin, R. (2011). Trade and Industrialization after Globalization"™s 2nd Unbundling: How Building and Joining a Supply Chain Are Different and Why It Matters. Cambridge MA: NBER Working Paper No. 17716.

Bernard, A., Redding, S., and Schott, P. (2007). Comparative Advantage and Heterogeneous Firms. Review of Economic Studies, 74, 31-66.

Branstetter, L., Fisman, R., Foley, C. F., and Saggi, K. (2011). Does Intellectual Property Rights Reform Spur Industrial Development? Journal of International Economics, 83, 27-36.

Das, S., Roberts, M. J., and Tybout, J. R. (2007). Market Entry Costs, Producer Heterogeneity, and Export Dynamics. Econometrica, 75, 837-873.

Ginarte, J. C. and Park, W. G. (1997). Determinants of Patent Rights: A Cross-National Study. Research Policy, 26, 283-301.

He, Y. and Maskus, K. E. (2012). Southern Innovation and Reverse Knowledge Spillovers: A Dynamic FDI Model. International Economic Review, 53, 281-304.

Head, K. and Mayer, T. (2014). Gravity Equations: Workhorse, Toolkit, Cookbook. In G. Gopinath, E. Helpman and K. Rogoff (eds.), Handbook of International Economics. Vol. 4 (pp. 131-195). Amsterdam: Elsevier-North Holland.

Maskus, K. E., (2012). Private Rights and Public Problems: The Economics of Intellectual Property in the 21st Century. Washington DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Maskus, K. E., Neumann, R., and Seidel, T. (2012). How National and International Financial Development Affect Industrial R&D. European Economic Review, 56, 72-83.

Maskus, K. E. and Ridley, W. (2016). Intellectual-Property Related Preferential Trade Agreements and the Composition of Trade. University of Colorado. Manuscript.

Milanovic, B. (2016). Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Park, W. G. (2008). Intellectual Property Rights and International Innovation. In K.E. Maskus (ed.), Intellectual Property, Growth and Trade: Frontiers of Economics and Globalization (pp. 289-324). Amsterdam: Elsevier-North Holland.

Romalis, J. (2004). Factor Proportions and the Structure of Commodity Trade. American Economic Review, 94, 67-97.

Saggi, K. (2016). Trade, Intellectual Property Rights and the World Trade Organization. In Bagwell, K. and Staiger, R. W. (eds.). Handbook of Commercial Policy (pp. 433-512). Amsterdam: Elsevier-North Holland.

Yang, L. and Maskus, K. E. (2009). Intellectual Property Rights, Technology Transfer and Exports in Developing Countries. Journal of Development Economics, 90, 232-236.

Agreements:

WTO (1994). Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement). Adopted on April 15, 1994 at Marrakesh.

Published

2017-07-04

How to Cite

Maskus, K. (2017). A New Agenda for Research in International Trade and Intellectual Property Rights. Iuris Dictio, (19). https://doi.org/10.18272/iu.v19i19.897

Issue

Section

Dossier