México The Unconventionality of Deadlines for Asylum Aplications in Mexico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18272/iu.i32.3071Abstract
The article questions the validity of establishing statutory deadline or specific time periods to provide access to asylum systems. Firstly, it explains that the right to seek and receive asylum is a substantive right that compel States to identify, acknowledge and protect persons with international protection needs. It is asserted that prescriptive deadlines nullify any possibility for refugees to be recognized as such, despite facing risks in their country of origin. Subsequently, a judgment issued by the Mexican Supreme Court is used as a basis to layout some of the arguments that have been used in favor of prescriptive deadline. Simultaneously, these arguments are challenged to emphasize the unconventionality of prescriptive deadline. Lastly, the article discusses some of the consequences that these norms have had in Mexico as a warning for the region.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Luis Xavier Carrancá Álvarez
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Submission of articles to be considered for the journal entails authorization for publication and acceptance of related, applicable rules. If not otherwise indicated, texts of the publication will be published under Creative Commons license.