Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Iuris Dictio

Dossier

Núm. 21 (2018)

The use of extra systemic precedents in the dialogue between the Inter-American Court and the European Court of Human Rights: an empirical investigation

  • Anna Maria Lecis Cocco Ortu
  • Tania Groppi
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18272/iu.v21i21.1136
Submitted
June 15, 2018
Published
2018-06-26

Abstract

The judicial dialogue between the two oldest regional human rights courts, the European Court of Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, has been studied for several years. However, many of these studies are not based on a large empirical analysis, which could demonstrate the effectiveness of this dialogue. Therefore, this article aims to verify, through empirical and systematic research, some academic conclusions and reflections on the interactions between these two regional courts. The methodology is the same as that applied in other empirical studies on the circulation of foreign precedents among constitutional courts. Only explicit references have been considered.

viewed = 742 times

References

  1. Balkin, J. M. (1997). The Constitution of Status. Yale Law Journal, 106, 2313-2374.
  2. Balkin, J. M. y Siegel, R. B. (2003). The American Civil Rights Tradition: Anticlassification or Antisubordination? University of Miami Law Review, 58(9), 9-33.
  3. Bernal Pulido, C. (2002). El juicio de igualdad en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Constitucional colombiana. En J. Vega Gómez y E. Corzo Sosa, Instrumentos de tutela y justicia cons- titucional (pp. 51-74). México: Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas de la UNAM.
  4. Brest, P. et al. (2006). Processes of Constitucional Decisionmaking (5th ed.). New York: Aspen Publishers, Inc.
  5. Carter, S. L. (1982). The Origins of Judicial Activism in the Protection of Minorities. Yale Law Journal, 91(7), 1287-1316.
  6. Ellsworth, P. C. (2005). Legal Reasoning. Michigan: University of Michigan Law School Scho- larship Repository.
  7. Giardelli, L., Toller, F. y Cianciardo, J. (2008). Los estándares para juzgar normas que realizan distinciones, paralelismos entre la doctrina de la Corte Suprema estadounidense y la del sistema interamericano sobre el derecho a la igualdad. En E. Ferrer Mac-Gregor y A. Zaldívar Lelo de Larrea. La ciencia del derecho procesal constitucional, Tomo IV (pp. 301-343). México: Marcial Pons.
  8. Gunther, G. (1972). In Search of Evolving Doctrine on a Changing Court, A Model for a Newer Equal Protection, Harvard Law Review, 86, 1-48.
  9. Law, S. (1984). Rethinking Sex and the Constitution. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 132, 955-1040.
  10. Naranjo de la Cruz, R. (2010). El sistema de derechos constitucionales y sus garantías, Manual de Derecho Constitucional. Madrid: Editorial Tecnos.
  11. Robinson, G. y Robinson, T. (2005). Korematsu and Beyond: Japanese Americans and the Origins of Strict Scrutiny. Law and Contemporary Problems, 68, 29-56.
  12. Sentencias:
  13. Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos (1938). United States v. Carolene Products Company, 304 U.S. 144.
  14. "” (1954). Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483
  15. "” (1967). Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos 1967).
  16. "” (1973). Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677.
  17. "” (1976). Massachussetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia, 427 U.S. 307
  18. "” (1976). Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190.
  19. "” (2003). Gratz v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244.
  20. "” (2003). Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306.
  21. "” (2007). Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, 551 U.S. 701 Corte Constitucional del Ecuador (2010). Sentencia No. 001-10-PJO-CC, 0999-09-JP. 22 de diciembre de 2010.
  22. "” (2012). Sentencia No. 245-12-SEP-CC, 0789-09-EP. 24 de julio de 2012.
  23. "” (2013). Sentencia No. 080-13-SEP-CC, 0445-11-EP. 9 de Octubre de 2013.
  24. "” (2016). Sentencia No. 003-16-SIA-CC, 0002-13-IA, 0003-13-IA y 0007-13-IA Acumulados (Corte Constitucional del Ecuador. 12 de Octubre de 2016.
  25. "” (2016). Sentencia No. 292-16-SEP-CC, 0734-13-EP. 7 de Septiembre de 2016.
  26. "” (2017). Sentencia No. 038-17-SEP-CC, 1737-12-EP. 15 de Febrero de 2017.
  27. "” (2017). Sentencia No. 057-17-SEP-CC, 1557-12-EP. Corte Constitucional del Ecuador. 8 de Marzo de 2017.
  28. "” (2018). Sentencia No. 004-18-SEP-CC, 0664-14-EP .3 de Enero de 2018).
  29. Resoluciones y opiniones consultivas:
  30. Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. Opinión Consultiva OC-4/84, OC-4/84. 19 de Enero de 1984.