Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio
Iuris Dictio

Miscelánea

Núm. 20 (2017)

El papel de la Organización de Estados Americanos en la resolución pacífica de conflictos

DOI
https://doi.org/10.18272/iu.v20i20.909
Enviado
junio 19, 2017
Publicado
2017-12-18

Resumen

Este artículo analiza el papel de la OEA en la creación de marcos políticos y adjudicativos para el arreglo pacífico de las disputas entre los Estados americanos. El artículo sugiere que, si bien la OEA ha logrado crear sólidos marcos políticos para el arreglo pacífico de disputas regionales, no logró diseñar marcos adjudicativos igualmente exitosos. La revitalización de los marcos de la OEA para el arreglo pacífico de las controversias mejoraría la paz y la estabilidad regionales; pero también es necesario si la OEA desea seguir siendo la organización regional prominente en el hemisferio occidental.

viewed = 1325 times

Citas

  1. Bosco, G. (1991). New Trends on Peaceful Settlement of Disputes Between States. North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation, 16 (2), 235-254.
  2. Brownlie, I. (1995). fte Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes in Practice. Pace International Law Review, 7 (2), 257-279.
  3. C. G. Fenwick (1954). fte Revision of the Pact of Bogota, The American Journal of Internation-al Law, 1 (48), 123-126.
  4. Cançado Trinidade, A. (2004). Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes: Current State and Perspectives. This study was presented by the author in the form of four lectures delivered at the XXXI Course of International Law Organized by the Inter-American Juridical Committee of the Organization of American States (OAS), in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, on August 2004.
  5. "” (2000). Regional Arrangements and Conflict Resolution in Latin America. Conflict Resolution: New Approaches and Methods UNESCO Publishing.
  6. Crocker, A. et. al. (2003). Ready for Prime Time: fte When, Who and Why of International Mediation. Negotiation Journal, 16 (2), 151-167.
  7. Dominguez, J. et. al. (2003). Boundary Disputes in Latin America. Peaceworks No. 50: United States Institute of Peace.
  8. Dulitzky, A. E. (2012). Twenty Reflections on the Process of Reflection, Aportes: Magazine of the Due Process of Law Foundation, 5 (16), 11.
  9. Herz, M. (2008). Does the Organisation of American States Matter? Crisis States Work- ing Papers Series No.2.
  10. Infante, M. (2016). The Pact of Bogota: Cases and Practice. ACDI, Bogotá, 10 (1), 85-116.
  11. Jeifets, V. and L. Khadorich (2015). OAS and Interstate Dispute Resolution at the Beginning of the 21st Century: General Pattern and Peculiarities. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 9 (1148- 1155).
  12. Karns, M. et. al. (2004). International Organizations: The Politics and Processes of Global Governance. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  13. Melander, E. et. al. (2016). Organized violence, 1989-2015. Journal of Peace Research 53, (5) 727-742. Pasqualucci, J. (2010). fte Americas. International Human Rights Law. Moeckli, D. et. al. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  14. Riggirozzi, P., Cooper, A. F., Páez Montalbán, R., Byron, J., and Stuenkel, O. (2015). Rethinking the OAS; a forum. Americas Quarterly.
  15. Sanchez, W. A., and Morrison, K. (2014). fte Future of the Organization of American States. E-International Relations, on August 28, 2014. Last visited November, 9.
  16. Talamas, M. (2011). Peaceful Settlement of Territorial Disputes, Américas: 50-3. Last visited June, 13.
  17. Zartman, W & Touval, S. (1996). International Mediation in the Post-Cold War Era, Manag- ing Global Chaos, eds. Chester Crocker, Fen Hampson and Pamela Aall. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press, 1996.
  18. Sentences:
  19. Case Concerning Border and Transborder Armed Actions (Nicaragua v. Costa Rica) ICJ Reports 1986. Discontinued in 1987.
  20. Case Concerning Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria (Preliminary Ob- jections). Judgment of 11 June 1998.
  21. Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States) (Jurisdiction and Admissibility). Judgment of 26 November 1984.
  22. IAComHR (2013). "˜Report No.96/13"™. Decision to archive. Inter-state case 12.779.
  23. International Treaties and Declarations:
  24. Inter-American Conference for the Maintenance for Peace (1936). Convention on the Maintenance, Preservation and Reestablishment of Peace. Signed on December 23, 1936.
  25. Eighth International Conference of the American States (1938). Inter-American Solidarity (Declaration of Lima). Adopted on December 24, 1938.
  26. Organization of American States (1947). Inter-American Treaty of Reciprocal Assistance (Rio Treaty). Concluded on September 2, 1947.
  27. "” (1948). American Treaty on Pacific Settlement (Pact of Bogota). Concluded on April 30, 1948.
  28. "” (1948 b). Charter of the Organization of American States. Concluded on 30 April 1948. Entered into force on January 29, 1996.
  29. "” (1969). American Convention on Human Rights. Adopted on November 22, 1969.
  31. Hague (1869). Convention for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes. Concluded on July 29, 1899.
  32. "” (1907). Convention for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes. Concluded on October 18, 1907.
  33. League of Nations (1919). The Covenant of the League of Nations. Adopted on 28 April 1919. Amended on December 1924.
  34. United Nations (1945). Charter of the United Nations. Signed on 26 June 1945, and came into force on 24 October 1945.
  35. "” (1946). The Statute of the International Court of Justice. Concluded on 18 April 1946.
  36. "” (1970). Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations. Adopt- ed on 24 October 1970.
  37. "” (1982). Manila Declaration on Peaceful settlement of disputes between States. Adopted on 15 November 1982.
  38. "” (1982). United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Concluded on 10 December 1982. Entered into force on 16 November 1994.
  39. Documents and reports of International Organizations:
  40. Organization of the American States (1985). A Study Prepared by the General Secretariat of the Organizations of American States in Compliance with Resolution AG/RES. 745 (XIV- 0/84). Part II. OEA/Ser.G cp/doc.1560/85 (Part II). 9 April 1985.
  41. "” (1985 b). Peaceful Settlement of Disputes in the Organization of American States. Committee on Hemispheric Security. OEA/Ser.G CP/CSH-278/00. 13 March 2000.
  42. Organization of the American States (2000). Fund for Peace: Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes. Resolution 1756 (XXX-O / 00), adopted on June 6, 2000.
  43. "” (2007). Inter-American Court of Justice (IACJ) (presented by Dr. Eduardo Vio Grossi). Inter-American Juridical Committee. CJI/doc. 267/07.
  44. "” (2007 b). Inter-American Court of Justice (IACJ). Inter-American Juridical Committee. CJI/RES.134 (LXXI-O/07).
  45. "” (2007 c). Inter-American Court of Justice (IACJ): some comments on the challenges of the Inter-American Juridical Committee on occasion of its centenary (presented by Dr. Eduardo Vio Grossi). Inter-American Juridical Committee. CJI/doc. 241/07
  46. "” (2007 d). Reasoned vote: Inter-American Court of Justice (presented by Dr. Eduardo Vio Grossi). Inter-American Juridical Committee. CJI/doc.283/07.
  47. "” (2007 e). Some comments on the challenges of the InterAmerican Juridical Committee on occasion of its centenary. Inter-American Juridical Committee. CJI/RES.121 (LXX-O/07).
  48. United Nations (1948). Systematic Survey of Treaties for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes, United Nations publication, 4 (49), 1928-1948.
  49. "” (1966). A Survey of Treaty Provisions for the Settlement of International Disputes, United Nations publication, 5 (66), 1949-1962.
  50. "” (1992). Handbook on Peaceful Settlement of Disputes between States. Office of Legal Affairs, Codification Division.