Iuris Dictio

Dossier especial

Núm. 36 (2025)

Comparando reportes de GIRH: ¿Se puede traducir un marco contexto-específico a un estándar universal?

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18272/iu.i36.3976
Enviado
julio 22, 2025
Publicado
2025-12-04

Resumen

Este artículo examina críticamente la implementación de la Gestión Integrada de los Recursos Hídricos (GIRH) tal y como se establece en el Objetivo de Desarrollo Sostenible 6. A pesar de su reconocimiento como una solución esencial para las prácticas hídricas insostenibles, el progreso se ha estancado, con solo un 57 % de implementación global prevista para 2023. Este artículo sostiene que la estandarización de la GIRH puede ocultar las complejidades de la gestión del agua en diversos contextos. Un análisis de la evolución de la GIRH, los parámetros de evaluación y los estudios de caso de Francia, Estados Unidos y Ecuador revela cómo los puntos de referencia universales pueden favorecer estructuras de gobernanza específicas, lo que conduce a evaluaciones engañosas del progreso y la eficacia en la gestión del agua.

Referencias

  1. Allouche, J. (2016). The birth and spread of IWRM: A case study of global policy diffusion and translation. Water Alternatives, 9(3), 412.
  2. Arora-Jonsson, S. (2023). The sustainable development goals: A universalist promise for the future. Futures, 146, 103087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2022.103087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2022.103087
  3. Bilalova, S., Newig, J., Tremblay-Lévesque, L.-C., Roux, J., Herron, C., & Crane, S. (2023). Pathways to water sustainability? A global study assessing the benefits of integrated water resources management. Journal of Environmental Management, 343, 118179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118179 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118179
  4. Environment, U. N. (2021, May 12). Indicator 6.5.1 | UNEP - UN Environment Programme. https://www.unep.org/goal-6-clean-water-and-sanitation/indicator-651
  5. Environment, U. N. (2023, November 16). Integrated water resources management | UNEP - UN Environment Programme. https://www.unep.org/topics/fresh-water/water-resources-management/integrated-water-resources-management
  6. French policy on water and sanitation—Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs. (n.d.-a). Retrieved May 27, 2025, from https://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/en/french-foreign-policy/climate-and-environment/protecting-the-environment-and-combating-pollution/french-policy-on-water-and-sanitation/
  7. French policy on water and sanitation—Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs. (n.d.-b). Retrieved June 1, 2025, from https://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/en/french-foreign-policy/climate-and-environment/protecting-the-environment-and-combating-pollution/french-policy-on-water-and-sanitation/
  8. Gerlak, A. K. (2006). Federalism and U.S. Water Policy: Lessons for the Twenty-First Century. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 36(2), 231–257. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pji032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pji032
  9. Giordano, M., & and Shah, T. (2014). From IWRM back to integrated water resources management. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 30(3), 364–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2013.851521 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2013.851521
  10. Goal 6 | Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (n.d.-a). Retrieved May 15, 2025, from https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal6
  11. Goal 6 | Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (n.d.-b). Retrieved May 15, 2025, from https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal6#targets_and_indicators
  12. Goal 6 | Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (n.d.-c). Retrieved May 29, 2025, from https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal6#targets_and_indicators
  13. Grigg, N. S. (2008). Integrated water resources management: Balancing views and improving practice. Water International, 33(3), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060802272820 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060802272820
  14. Grigg, N. S. (2024). Framework and Function of Integrated Water Resources Management in Support of Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 16(13), 5441. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135441 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135441
  15. History of IWRM. (2016, June 7). https://www.geo.fu-berlin.de/en/v/iwrm/Introduction/History-of-IWRM/index.html
  16. IWRM Data Portal—Country Reports. (n.d.-a). Retrieved May 28, 2025, from https://iwrmdataportal.unepdhi.org/country-reports/france DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9798229017428.002
  17. IWRM Data Portal—Country Reports. (n.d.-b). Retrieved May 28, 2025, from https://iwrmdataportal.unepdhi.org/country-reports/united%20states%20of%20america
  18. IWRM Data Portal—Country Reports. (n.d.-c). Retrieved May 12, 2025, from https://iwrmdataportal.unepdhi.org/country-reports/ecuador
  19. IWRM Data Portal—Data Collection, Monitoring Guide. (n.d.). Retrieved May 12, 2025, from https://iwrmdataportal.unepdhi.org/data-collection
  20. Kauffman, C. M., & Martin, P. L. (2023). How Ecuador’s Courts Are Giving Form and Force to Rights of Nature Norms. Transnational Environmental Law, 12(2), 366–395. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102523000080 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102523000080
  21. Matz, M. (2008). Rethinking IWRM Under Cultural Considerations. In W. Scheumann, S. Neubert, & M. Kipping (Eds.), Water Politics and Development Cooperation: Local Power Plays and global Governance (pp. 176–201). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76707-7_8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76707-7_8
  22. Meran, G., Siehlow, M., & von Hirschhausen, C. (2021). The Economics of Water: Rules and Institutions. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48485-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48485-9
  23. Nagata, K., Shoji ,Izumi, Arima ,Tomohiro, Otsuka ,Takahiro, Kato ,Kumiko, Matsubayashi ,Miha, & and Omura, M. (2022). Practicality of integrated water resources management (IWRM) in different contexts. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 38(5), 897–919. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2021.1921709 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2021.1921709
  24. Progress on the level of water stress. (2024). FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cd2179en DOI: https://doi.org/10.4060/cd2179en
  25. Puentestar, D. (2025, January 29). Sentencia 95-20-IN/24. Corte Constitucional Del Ecuador. https://www.corteconstitucional.gob.ec/sentencia-95-20-in-24/
  26. Richard, S., Bouleau, G., & Barone, S. (2010). Water governance in France: Institutional framework, stakeholders, arrangements and process. In Water governance and public policies in Latin America and Europe. Jacobi P. and Sinisgali P. (Eds.) (pp. 137–178). Anna Blume. https://hal.science/hal-00857368
  27. Sentencias 45-15-IN-22 En el Caso No. 45-15-IN Declárese la inconstitucionalidad por la forma de la Ley Orgánica de Recursos Hídricos, Usos y Aprovechamiento del Agua y su Reglamento. (n.d.). vLex. Retrieved June 1, 2025, from https://vlex.ec/vid/45-15-in-22-906278464
  28. The Dublin Statement on Water and Sustainable Development. (n.d.). Retrieved June 1, 2025, from https://www.gdrc.org/uem/water/dublin-statement.html
  29. UNEP-DHI Centre (Director). (2023, April 3). SDG 651 2023 Monitoring Overview Part 2: Timeline & Helpdesk [Video recording]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sef7Nwp8_SU
  30. Wingfield, S., Martínez-Moscoso, A., Quiroga, D., & Ochoa-Herrera, V. (2021). Challenges to Water Management in Ecuador: Legal Authorization, Quality Parameters, and Socio-Political Responses. Water, 13(8), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13081017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w13081017

Descargas

Los datos de descarga todavía no están disponibles.