Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio
Iuris Dictio

Miscelánea

Núm. 22 (2018)

La regulación de la privacidad en Internet en un contexto descentralizado y no consolidado: la gobernanza de Internet y las iniciativas de múltiples partes interesadas como mecanismos reguladores

DOI
https://doi.org/10.18272/iu.v22i22.1063
Enviado
marzo 6, 2018
Publicado
2018-12-13

Resumen

El presente artículo analiza el derecho a la privacidad en el contexto del Internet. Las iniciativas de múltiples partes interesadas son una alternativa que ya ha proporcionado una estructura regulatoria en varios aspectos de Internet, ya sea la seguridad, el flujo libre de información o la privacidad en línea. Aunque hay elementos que hacen que no sea una solución total, este artículo analiza algunas razones por las cuales la privacidad en línea debe ser regulada por mecanismos de Gobernanza de Internet y por entidades que no responden solo a los gobiernos o solo a empresas privadas. En este trabajo, se da una mirada general a esta alternativa, sin descuidar los otros enfoques que se deben dar al tema de la privacidad en línea.

viewed = 786 times

Citas

  1. Alves, S. (2014). Internet Governance: fte Internet Balkanization Fragmentation. Draft 20th ITS Biennial Conference, 1-15.
  2. Aquisti, A. and Brandimarte, L. (2015). Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science, 30, 509-514.
  3. Benkler, Y. (2013). Practical Anarchism: Peer Mutualism, Market Power, and the Fallible State. Politics and Society, 41(2), 213-215.
  4. Benkler, Y. (2006). The Welth of Networks. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. Calo, R. (2015). Privacy and Markets: A Love Story. Notre Dame Law Review, 91, 649-690.
  5. Cohen, J. (2013). What Privacy is for. Harvard Law Review, 126, 649-690.
  6. Cooper, M. (2013). Why growing up is hard to do: institutional challenges for internet governance in the "quarter-life crisis" of the digital revolution. Journal on Telecommunications & High Technology Law 11 (1), 45-113.
  7. DeCew, J. (2015). Privacy. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  8. Dotty, N. and Mulligan, D. (2013). Internet Multistakeholder processes and Techno-Policy Standards: Initial Reflections on Privacy at the World Wide Web Consortium. Journal on Telecommunications and High Technology Law, 11 (1), 135-184.
  9. Fransen, L. (2012, January). Multi-Stakeholder Governance and Voluntary Programme Interactions: Legitimation Politics in the Institutional Design of Corporate Social Responsibility. Socio-Economic Review, 10 (1) (1), 163-192.
  10. Kruner, C., Cate, F., Millard, C. and Svantesson, D. (2015). Editorial: Internet Balkanization gathers pace: is privacy the real driver? International Data Privacy Law 5 (1), 1-2.
  11. Lapenta G. H. (2013). Background paper, Privacy as Innovation III.
  12. Manyka, J. and Roxburgh, C. (2001). The great transformer: The impact of the Internet on economic growth and prosperity. San Francisco: McKinsey Global Institute.
  13. Mary, C. and Culnan, M. J. (2000). Protecting Privacy Online: Is Self-Regulation Working? Journal of Public Policy & Marketing , 19 (1), 20-26.
  14. Nye, J. S. (2014). fte Regime Complex for Managing Global Cyber Activities (pp. 4-20).
  15. Global Commission on the Internet Governance. London: CIGI.
  16. Palfrey, J. and Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital: understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York: Basic Books.
  17. Rainie, L. and Duggan, M. (2016). Privacy and Information Sharing. Pew Research Center (Dec.), 1-45.
  18. Solove, D. J. (2006). A Taxonomy of Privacy. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 154, 477-570.
  19. Tene, O. and Hughes, T. (2014). fte Promise and Shortcomings of Privacy Multistakeholder Policymaking: a Case Study. Maine Law Review , 437-465.
  20. The Human Rights Council. (2018). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy.
  21. The London Schoolof Economicsand Political Science(2014). Unfield Field: fte"Splinternet". Media Policy Project Blog.
  22. The World Bank Group. (2016). Internet users per 100 people. The World Bank Indicators.
  23. WGIG. (2005). Report of the Working Group on Internet Governance. Chateau de Bossey.
  24. World Wide Web Consortium (2013). Tracking Protection Working Group. W3C.
  25. Articles and News:
  26. A&E Television Networks. (2016). The Invention of the Internet. History.
  27. Balkan, A. (2015). Apple vs Google on privacy: a tale of absolute competitive advantage.
  28. Esquire. (2008). Vint Cerf: What I"™ve Learned. Esquire Entertainment Interviews.
  29. Freepress. (2016). Net Neutrality: What you need to know now, Free Press Action Fund.
  30. Gibbs, S. (2015). Samsung"™s voice-recording smart TVs breach privacy law, campaigners clalim. The Guardian.
  31. Grassegger, H. (2014, February 9). States are emerging from the Web. NZZ Mediengruppe.
  32. Gunaratna, S. (2016). fte Snowden effect: Silicon Valley vs. the government. CBS NEWS.
  33. Hasselbalch Lapenta, G. (2013). Privacy is the new business model. Mediamocracy.
  34. Kaspersen, A. (2015, July 21). Can you have both security and privacy in the internet age? World Economic Forum Global Governance.
  35. Love, D. (2013, June 29). Business Insider. Tech Insider.
  36. Lynley, M. (2018, April 13). Techcrunch.
  37. Marsan, C. (2015). "New IAB chair fears Internet balkanization", Network World.
  38. Maurer, T. and Morgus, R. (2014, February 19). Slate. Retrieved December 3, 2016, from Stop Calling Decentralization fot he Internet "Balkanization".
  39. Meinrath, S. (2013, October 11). fte Future of the Internet: Balkanization and Borders. Time.
  40. Pew Research Center (2016). Number, Facts and Trends Shaping your World.
  41. RAND Corporation. (2000). Where Will the Information Revolution Lead? Transcendental Destination.
  42. Rouse, M. (2016). Internet technologies. Tech Target.
  43. Schaake, M. (2016). fte World Post. The Huffington Post.
  44. Sentences:
  45. U.S Supreme Court (1973). Roe v Wade 410 US 113. Jan. 22, 1973.