Mitigación vs. adaptación. Un dilema de supuestos y sentido común
Article Sidebar
Downloads
Main Article Content
Abstract
¿Mitigación o Adaptación? Este es el principal dilema en la prescripción de políticas destinadas a enfrentar el cambio climático. La Economía y las ciencias Socio-ambientales han dado predominio a las medidas de mitigación; no obstante, dichas prescripciones se encuentran sustentadas en análisis que usan supuestos irreales con referencia al comportamiento del ser humano. A continuación, expongo la necesidad de revisar los supuestos en los cuales subyace la praxis de dichas ciencias, y a la vez la importancia de incluir dentro de las opciones de políticas las medidas de adaptación (las cuales analizo en términos generales), consideradas por muchos un tabú, ya que se cree que representan el pesimismo del hombre sobre su capacidad para resolver el problema del cambio climático.
Article Details
References
Ackerman, F., 1997. Consumed in theory: alternative perspectives on the economics of consumption. Journal of Economic Issues 31,651-664.
Allee, J., 2005. Product liability. Law Journal Press, New York.
Boweles, y S., Reyes, S., 2009. Economic incentives and social preferences: a preference- based lucas critique of public policy. CESIFO Working paper No. 2734, Venice, Italy.
Clark, A., y Oswald, A., 1996. Satisfaction and comparison income, Journal of Public Economics, 61, 359-381.
Coase, R., 1960. The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3, 1-44.
Coleman, J., 1990. Foundations of social theory, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge.
Corneo, G., y Jeanne, O., 1997. Conspicuous consumption, snobbism and conformism. Journal of Public Economics 66, 55-71.
Evans, D., y Cruse, P., 2004. Emotion, evolution and rationality. Oxford University Press, New York.
Fehr, E., y Zych, P., 1994. Power of temptation: irrationally myopic excess consumption in an addiction experiment.
Mimeo, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, Zurich.
Fehr, E., y Falk, A., 2002. Psychological foundations of incentives. European Economic Re- view 46, 687-724.
Fershtman, C., y Weiss, Y., 1993. Social status, culture and economic performance. Economic Journal 103, 964-969.
Fiala, N. 2009. The greenhouse hamburger. Scientific American 2, 72-75.
Frank, R. 1985. Choosing the Right Pond: Human Behavior and the Quest for Status. Oxford University Press, New York.
Frank, R., 1988. Passion within reason. W. W. Norton and Company, New York.
Frank, R. 1999. Luxury Fever. The Free Press, New York.
Frey, B., 1997. A constitution of knaves crowds out civic virtues. Economic Journal 107, 1043-1053.
Frey, B., y Oberholtzer-Gee, F., 1997. The cost of price incentives: an empirical analysis of motivation crowding out. American Economic Review 87, 746-755.
Friedman, J., 1996. The rational choice controversy. Yale University Press, New Haven.
Levitt, S., y Dubner, S., 2009. Superfreakonomics. HarperCollins Publishers, New York.
Mason, R., 2000. Conspicuous consumption and the positional economy: policy and prescription since 1970. Managerial and Decision Economics 21, 123-132.
NHTSA, 2009. Lives saved calculations for seat belts and frontal air bags. Mathematical Analysis Division, National Center for Statistics and Analysis, Washington, DC.
Norton, B., 2005. Sustainability: a philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
O'Neill, J., 1993. Ecology, policy and politics: human well-being and the natural. Routledge, Lon- don.
O'Neill, J., y Spash, C., 2000. Conceptions of value in environmental decision-making. Environmental Values 9, 521-535.
Pielke, R., Prins, G., Rayner, y S., Sarewitz, D., 2007. Lifting the taboo on adaptation. Science 445, 597-598.
Rabin, M., 1998. Psychology and economics. Journal of Economic Literature 36, 11-46.
Rabin, M., 2002. A perspective on psychology and economics. Working Paper E02-313. Department of Economics. University of California, Berkeley.
Reeve, J., 2008. Understanding motivation and emotion. John Wiley y Sons, New York. Titmuss, R., 1971. The gift relationship: from human blood to social policy. Pantheon Books, New York.
Tversky, A., y Kahneman, D., 1983. Extension versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review 90, 293-315.
Vohs, K., Mead, N., y Goode, M., 2006. The psychological consequences of money. Science 314, 1154-1156.
Wilkinson, N., 2008. An introduction to behavioral economics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
Zafirovski, M., 2003. Human rational behavior and economic rationality. Electronic Journal of Socio- logy 7. http://www.sociology.org/content/vol7.2702_zafirovski.html