How to communicate climate change without creating skepticism? Notes for informative treatment
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article details the factors that must be considered in the communication of climate change to generate citizen engagement. Among other aspects, it talks about the importance of changing journalistic routines such as contrast, for which skeptics and deniers are included in the news. Good contents simplify, without being reductionist. In addition, they focus on science and its method and do not fall into scientism.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
Section
#PorVenir
Authors who publish in the journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors will retain their copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work. The work will simultaneously be subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows third parties to share the work provided that its authorship is acknowledged and that its first publication in this journal is cited.
- Authors may enter into additional non-exclusive licensing agreements for the distribution of the published version of the work. This allows them to publish it in a monographic volume or reproduce it in other forms, provided that the initial publication in this journal is acknowledged.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to disseminate their work through the Internet:
- Before submission to the journal, authors may deposit the manuscript in preprint archives or repositories (preprint servers/repositories), including arXiv, bioRxiv, figshare, PeerJ Preprints, SSRN, among others. This may foster valuable academic exchanges and increase citations of the published work (see The Open Access Effect).
- After submission, authors are encouraged to deposit their article in their institutional repository, personal website, or scientific social networks (such as Zenodo, ResearchGate, or Academia.edu).
How to Cite
Muñoz-Pico, H. P. (2021). How to communicate climate change without creating skepticism? : Notes for informative treatment. #PerDebate, 5(1), 168-189. https://doi.org/10.18272/pd.v5i1.2384