Coating of gingival recession class I and II of Miller, treated with Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM), Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft (SECT graft) and Coronally Advanced Flap with Enamel Matrix Derivative (CAF) + (EMD). Double-blind randomized clinical trials.
Article Sidebar
Downloads
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the clinical findings obtained in the treatment of gingival recessions with the use of acellular dermal matrix (MDA), subepithelial connective tissue graft (ICS) and coronal repositioned flap with enamel matrix proteins (CRC) + (DME). Fifteen defects will be treated in patients with Class I and II of Miller in canines or premolars. The treatment with MDA, ETCS and (CRC) + (DME) will be made randomly, clinical measurements will be compared 3 months after surgical procedures. These data include: percentage of root coverage, height and width of the gingival recession, probing depth, clinical attachment level and height of keratinized gingiva mucogingival line position. Statistical analysis will be performed using a normality test, hypothesis testing, a significant error of 5% (ANOVA).
Article Details
References
American Academy of Periodontology. Glossary of Periodontal Terms. 2001.
Gaertner W, Hagerman G, Potter M, Karulf R. Experimental evaluation of a bovine pericardium-derived collagen matrix buttress in ileocolic and colon anastomoses. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2010; 92(1):48-54.
Zucchelli G, De Sanctis M, Long-term outcome following treatment of multiple Miller class I and II recession defects in esthetic areas of the mouth. J Periodontol. 2005;76(12):2286-92.
Tinti C, Vincenzi G, Cocchetto R. Guided tissue regeneration in mucogingival surgery. J Periodontol. 1993; 64(11):1184-91.
Burkhardt R, Lang N. Coverage of localized gingival recessions: comparison of micro- and macrosurgical techniques. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(3):287-93.
Trombelli L, Scabbia A, Tatakis D, Calura G. Subpedicle connective tissue graft versus guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession defects. J Periodontol.1998;69(11 ):1271 -7.
Rosetti E, Maecantonio R, Rossa C, Chaves E, Goissis G, Marcantonio E. Treatment of gingival recession: comparative study between subepithelial connective tissue graft and guided tissue regeneration. J Periodontology.2000;71 (9): 1441 -7.
Tarnow D. Semilunar coronally repositioned flap. J Clin Periodontol. 1986; 13(3): 182-5.
Tal H. Subgingival acellular dermal matrix allograft for the treatment of gimgival recession: a case report. J Periodontol. 1999;70(9):1118-24.
Pilloni A, Paolantonio M, Camargo P. Root Coverage with a Coronally Positioned Flap Used in Combination with Enamel Matrix Derivative: 18-Month Clinical Evaluation. J Periodontoly.2006;77(12):2031 -9.
Hammarstrom L. Enamel matrix, cementum development and regeneration. J. Clin. Periodontol. 1997;24(9):658-68.
Raetzke, P. Covering localized areas of root exposure employing the envelope technnique. J Periodontol. 1985;56(397):397-402.
Bouchard P, Malet J, Borghetti A. Decision-making in aesthetics: root coverage revisited. J Periodontol 2000. 2001;27:97-120.
Berlucchi I, Francetti L, Del Fabrro M, Testori T, Weinstein R. Enamel Matrix Protein (Emdogain) in Combination with Coronally Advanced Flap or Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft in the Treatment of Shallow Gingival Recesions. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002;22(6):583-93.