Comparison of microfiltration apicocoronal between MTA and Biodentine in single-rooted teeth.

Article Sidebar

PDF (Español (España))

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published: Jan 3, 2015

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18272/oi.v1i1.90
Issue
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2015)
Section
Artículos Rehabilitación Oral

Main Article Content

María Eugenia Correa Terán
Universidad San Francisco de Quito
Nicolás Castrillón Sarria
Universidad San Francisco de Quito

Abstract

The retrograde filling material used in apicoectomy nowadays is the MTA, but in search of the ideal material, a new cement called Biodentine has been introduced to the market. This study had as an objective to evaluate and to compare the apico-coronal microleakage of MTA degree, with a Digital Stereo Microscope and Biodentine as a retrograde filling material. The results indicated that a 3 hour immersion using Biodentine, has a higher efficiency, up to 18,85%, compared to the MTA. And 6 hours of immersion using Biodentine, has a higher efficiency up to 19%, compared to the MTA. In conclusion, the longer is the immersion, the bigger is the difference of cement microfiltration resistance, having the Biodentine better sealing properties over time.

Keywords:
apicoectomy, MTA, Biodentine, microleakage,

Article Details

How to Cite
Correa Terán, M. E., & Castrillón Sarria, N. (2015). Comparison of microfiltration apicocoronal between MTA and Biodentine in single-rooted teeth. OdontoInvestigación, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.18272/oi.v1i1.90
Author Biographies

María Eugenia Correa Terán, Universidad San Francisco de Quito

Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Colegio de Ciencias de la Salud, Escuela de Odontología, Clínica Odontológica, Campus Cumbayá, oficina CO 106, casilla postal 1 7-1200-841. Quito-Ecuador.

Nicolás Castrillón Sarria, Universidad San Francisco de Quito

Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Colegio de Ciencias de la Salud, Escuela de Odontología, Clínica Odontológica, Campus Cumbayá, oficina CO 106, casilla postal 1 7-1200-841. Quito-Ecuador.

References

Shahriar S. Comparison of the sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cementused as root-end filling materials. Journal of Oral Science. 2011; 53(4):517-522.

Sluik S. Evaluation of setting properties and retention characteristics of mineral trioxide aggregate when used as a furcation perforation repair material. J Endod. 1998;24:768-71.

Claudio H. In Vitro Evaluation of Apical Sealing in Root Apex Treated with Demineralization Agents and Retrofiled with Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Through Marginal Dye Leakage. Braz Dent J 2005; 16(3): 187-191.

Emre B. Biocompatibility of retrograde root filling materials: A review. AustEndod J.2008; 34: 30-35.

Ramachandran N. Non-microbial etiology: periapical cysts sustain post-treatment apical periodontitis. Endodontic Topics. 2003;6: 96-113.

Masahiro F. A Case of Apical Fenestration Misdiagnosed as Persistent Apical Periodontitis. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll.2012; 53(1): 23-26.

Ondokuz M. Biocompatibility of retrograde root filling materials: A review. AustEndod J. 2008;34:30-35.

Praveen S. Electrical and dye leakage comparison of three different root-end materials: A comparative in vitro study. Indian Journal of Dental Education. 2012;5(1).

Martins A. In Vitro Evaluation of Apical Sealing in Root Apex Treated with Demineralization Agents and Retrofiled with Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Through Marginal Dye Leakage. Braz Dent J. 2005; 16(3): 187-191.

Gómez V. Apicectomía quirúrgica: propuesta de un protocolo basado en la evidencia. Rev esp cir oral maxilofac. 2011;33(2):61-66.

Saunders W. Considerations in the revision of previous surgical procedures. Endodontic Topics. 2005; 11:206-218.

Pawar A. Kokate S. Shah R. Management of a large periapical lesion using Biodentine(â„¢) as retrograde restoration with eighteen months evident follow up. J Conserv Dent. 2013;16(6):573-5.